Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Remote Sensing of Forest Biophysical Structure Using Mixture Decomposition and Geometric Reflectance Models

Open access
Hall, Forrest G., Shimabukuro, Yosio E., Huemmrich, Karl F.·1995·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Using geometric shadow and linear mixture models we develop and evaluate an algorithm to infer several important structural parameters of stands of black spruce (Picea mariana), the most common boreal forest dominant. We show, first, that stand reflectances for this species can be represented as linear combinations of the reflectances of more elemental radiometric components: sunlit crowns, sunlit background, and shadow. Secondly, using a geometric model, we calculate how the fractions of these radiometric elements covary with each other. Then, using hand‐held measurements of the reflectances of the sunlit background, sphagnum moss (Sphagnum spp.), and assuming shadow reflectance to be that of deep, clear lakes, we infer the reflectance of sunlit crowns from the geometric shadow model and low‐altitude reflectance measurements acquired by a helicopter‐mounted radiometer. Next, we assume that the reflectance for all black spruce stands is simply a linear combination of shadow, sunlit crown, and sunlit background reflectance, weighted in proportion to the relative areal fractions of these pixel elements. We then solve a set of linear equations for the areal fractions of these elements using as input helicopter observations of total stand reflectance. Using this algorithm, we infer the values for the areal proportions of sunlit canopy, sunlit background, and shadow for 31 black spruce stands of varying biomass density, net primary productivity, etc. We show empirically and theoretically that the areal proportions of these radiometric elements are related to a number of stand biophysical characteristics. Specifically, the shadow fraction is increasing with increasing biomass density, average diameter at breast height, leaf area index (LAI), and aboveground net primary productivity (NPP), while sunlit background fraction is decreasing. We show that the end member fractions can be used to estimate biomass with a standard error of ≈ 2 kg/m 2, LAI with a standard error of 0.58, dbh with a standard error of ≈ 2 cm, and aboveground NPP with a standard error of 0.07 kg·m‐2·yr‐1. We also show that the fraction of sunlit canopy is only weakly correlated with the biophysical variables and are thus able to show why a popular vegetation index, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), does not provide a useful measure of these biophysical characteristics. We do show, however, that NDVI should be related to the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation incident upon and absorbed by the canopy. This work has convinced us that a paradigm shift in the remote sensing of biophysical characteristics is in order–a shift away from direct inference of biophysical characteristics from vegetation indices and toward a two‐step process, in which (1) stand‐level reflectance is approximated in terms of linear combinations of reflectance‐invariant, spectrally distinct components (spectral end members) and mixture decomposition used to infer the areal fractions of these components, e.g., shadow, sunlit crown, and sunlit background, followed by (2) the use of radiative transfer models to compute biophysical characteristic values as a function of the end member fractions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2269350

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Hall, F. G., Shimabukuro, Y. E., & Huemmrich, K. F.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-11
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
993-1013
ISSN
  • 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5582
OpenAlex
W2013203541
Cited by
260
References
18
FWCI
21.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote Sensing of Forest Biophysical Structure Using Mixture Decomposition and Geometric Reflectance Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2269350
The paper
Hall, F. G., Shimabukuro, Y. E., & Huemmrich, K. F. (1995). Remote Sensing of Forest Biophysical Structure Using Mixture Decomposition and Geometric Reflectance Models. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269350

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.