The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient
Abstract
I examined the distribution and abundance of bird species across an urban gradient, and concomitant changes in community structure, by censuring summer resident bird populations at six sites in Santa Clara County, California (all former oak woodlands). These sites represented a gradient of urban land use that ranged from relatively undisturbed to highly developed, and included a biological preserve, recreational area, golf course, residential neighborhood, office park, and business district. The composition of the bird community shifted from predominantly native species in the undisturbed area to invasive and exotic species in the business district. Species richness, Shannon diversity, and bird biomass peaked at moderately disturbed sites. One or more species reached maximal densities in each of the sites, and some species were restricted to a given site. The predevelopment bird species (assumed to be those found at the most undisturbed site) dropped out gradually as the sites became more urban. These patterns were significantly related to shifts in habitat structure that occurred along the gradient, as determined by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) using the environmental variables of percent land covered by pavement, buildings, lawn, grasslands, and trees or shrubs. I compared each formal site to four additional sites with similar levels of development within a two‐country area to verify that the bird communities at the formal study sites were representative of their land use category.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Cited by
The Effects of Urban Patterns on Ecosystem Function
Alberti, M. (2005) · International Regional Science Review · doi:10.1177/0160017605275160 · Cited by 1,020
Domesticated nature: Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare
Kareiva, P., Watts, S., McDonald, R., & Boucher, T. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140170 · Cited by 945
Living in the city: can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter'?
Kark, S., Iwaniuk, A., Schalimtzek, A., & Banker, E. (2007) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01638.x · Cited by 567
Clergeau, P., Savard, J.-P. L., Mennechez, G., & Falardeau, G. (1998) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1369707 · Cited by 544
Mcintyre, N. E., Knowles-Yánez, K., & Hope, D. (2000) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1023/a:1009540018553 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Blair, R. B.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 506-519
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W1971306837
- Cited by
- 1,494
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2269387
- The paper
- Blair, R. B. (1996). Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.