The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effects of Land Use on the Structure of Ground‐Foraging Ant Communities in the Argentine Chaco
Abstract
We examined the responses of a ground‐foraging ant community to a gradient of land‐use intensity in a grazing agroecosystem in the Chaco of northern Argentina. The gradient extended from a highly degraded condition characteristic of traditional grazing practices, through an area of less severe disturbance where grazing was less concentrated, to two areas in which grazing had been managed for 3 and 18 yr, respectively. Ground cover changed along this gradient from bare to litter‐covered, ground‐layer vegetation changed from sparse to a structurally complex mixture of grasses and forbs, and canopy cover increased in areas of intermediate grazing intensity and then decreased. Community diversity varied among the sites depending on both season and scale of analysis. Site‐scale ant species richness was slightly higher in sites of intermediate disturbance in the summer‐wet season but was much greater in the least disturbed site in the winter‐dry season. The same dry‐season pattern was evident in both species richness and diversity at the scale of transects within sites, whereas species richness at the scale of individual traps within transects was significantly lower at sites of intermediate disturbance than at either highly restored or highly degraded sites. Abundances of individual ant species and functional groups also changed along the land‐use gradient. Litter‐inhabiting cryptic species and specialized predators responded positively to grazing management, whereas opportunists and the hot‐climate specialist Forelius nigriventris were prevalent in highly disturbed areas. Other functional groups exhibited redundancy and species turnover along the gradient. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) revealed that the ant faunas at the extremes of the land‐use gradient were more similar than expected. We hypothesize that the interaction of local‐scale habitat features with historical and biogeographic influences may determine the responses of this ant community to land use, and that highly degraded areas may have conservation value because they are regional sources of arid‐adapted ants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of large herbivores on grassland arthropod diversity
van Klink, R., van der Plas, F., van Noordwijk, C. G. E. (., WallisDeVries, M. F., & Olff, H. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12113 · Cited by 332
Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach
Pinto, N., & Keitt, T. H. (2009) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9303-y · Cited by 235
Rivera, L. F., Armbrecht, I., & Calle, Z. (2013) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.011 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Bestelmeyer, B. T., & Wiens, J. A.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1225-1240
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2027565028
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Land Use on the Structure of Ground‐Foraging Ant Communities in the Argentine Chaco. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2269603
- The paper
- Bestelmeyer, B. T., & Wiens, J. A. (1996). The Effects of Land Use on the Structure of Ground‐Foraging Ant Communities in the Argentine Chaco. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.