The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Visual Display of Quantitative Information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
D'Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001 · Cited by 1,738
Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution
Cabral, B., & Leedom, L. C. (1993) · Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/166117.166151 · Cited by 1,315
Seesoft-a tool for visualizing line oriented software statistics
Eick, S. C., Steffen, J. L., & Sumner, E. E. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.177365 · Cited by 616
Designing and reporting on computational experiments with heuristic methods
Barr, R. S., Golden, B. L., Kelly, J. P., Resende, M. G. C., & Stewart, W. R. (1995) · Journal of Heuristics · doi:10.1007/bf02430363 · Cited by 448
The Geometric Interpretation of Correspondence Analysis
Greenacre, M., & Hastie, T. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1987.10478446 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Zelterman, D., & Tufte, E. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-06
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 386
- Pages
- 469
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4299298909
- Cited by
- 2,059
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2288294
- The paper
- Zelterman, D., & Tufte, E. R. (1984). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/2288294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
