CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,796Data Visualization and AnalyticsVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods

Cleveland, William S., McGill, Robert·1984·Journal of the American Statistical Association
DOI 10.2307/2288400
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The subject of graphical methods for data analysis and for data presentation needs a scientific foundation. In this article we take a few steps in the direction of establishing such a foundation. Our approach is based on graphical perception—the visual decoding of information encoded on graphs—and it includes both theory and experimentation to test the theory. The theory deals with a small but important piece of the whole process of graphical perception. The first part is an identification of a set of elementary perceptual tasks that are carried out when people extract quantitative information from graphs. The second part is an ordering of the tasks on the basis of how accurately people perform them. Elements of the theory are tested by experimentation in which subjects record their judgments of the quantitative information on graphs. The experiments validate these elements but also suggest that the set of elementary tasks should be expanded. The theory provides a guideline for graph construction: Graphs should employ elementary tasks as high in the ordering as possible. This principle is applied to a variety of graphs, including bar charts, divided bar charts, pie charts, and statistical maps with shading. The conclusion is that radical surgery on these popular graphs is needed, and as replacements we offer alternative graphical forms—dot charts, dot charts with grouping, and framed-rectangle charts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080

Cites

15 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 24 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 39 references

24 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–534 of 534

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R.
Affiliations
AT&T (United States) (US)
ORCID
Cleveland, William S.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1984-09
Volume
79
Issue
387
Pages
531-554
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
DOI
10.2307/2288400
OpenAlex
W1971781829
Cited by
1,796
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 70
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
graphical perception, task sequencing, graph construction, bar charts, pie charts, statistical maps, shading, data visualization, data presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review