The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization
Abstract
R. H. Strotz; Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 23, Issue 3, 1 January 1955, Pages 165–180, https
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The hyperbolic shape of the discounting function also helps to explain the previously mentioned violations of the stationarity axiom in economics (Strotz, 1955); i.e., the tendency to prefer LLRs when SSRs are not readily available, and to reverse this preference when the SSR is immediately accessible.”
From Changing Delay Discounting and Impulsive Choice: Implications for Addictions, Prevention, and Human Health (2019) · cites this paper as Strotz, 1955
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,000
Argumentation in Foreign Policy Settings
Axelrod, R. (1977) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200277702100410 · Cited by 31
Time-Consistent Stopping Under Decreasing ImpatiencePreprint
Huang, Y., & Huu, A. N. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2565742 · Cited by 31
The Ethical Mirage: A Temporal Explanation as to Why We Aren't as Ethical as We Think We ArePreprint
Tenbrunsel, A. E., Diekmann, K. A., Wade‐Benzoni, K. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1010385 · Cited by 28
“’s “want/should” theory provides operational specification to the more general class of issues known as the “multiple selves” problem (Strotz, 1956; Ainslie, 1975, 1992; Sen, 1977; Thaler, 1980; Winston, 1980; Schelling, 1984; Elster, 1985).”
BackgroundDynamic Choice Under AmbiguityPreprint
Siniscalchi, M. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.948928 · Cited by 31
“In Strotz’s own words, at every decision point, a consistent planner chooses “the best plan among those that [s]he will actually follow” ([46], p.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUseful lies: The twisted rationality of denial
Friedrichs, J. (2012) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2012.724354 · Cited by 30
Towards an Economics of Natural Equals
Levy, D. M., & Peart, S. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108571661 · Cited by 30
Changing Behavior Using the Transtheoretical Model
DiClemente, C. C., & Graydon, M. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.010 · Cited by 35
Dynamic Consistency and Regret
Caliendo, F., & Findley, T. S. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.09.014 · Cited by 30
Optimal Life-cycle Capital Taxation under Self-Control Problems
Pavoni, N., & Yazıcı, H. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12323 · Cited by 26
“We model preferences that exhibit self-control problems through the quasi-hyperbolic discounting framework of Laibson (1997), which builds on the seminal works of Strotz (1955) and Phelps and Pollak (1968).”
Continuous time mean-variance portfolio optimization with piecewise state-dependent risk aversion
Cui, X., Xu, L., & Zeng, Y. (2015) · Optimization Letters · doi:10.1007/s11590-015-0970-8 · Cited by 30
“Basak and Chabakauri [2] extended Strotz [12]’s proposal of strategy of consistent planning and reformulated the dynamicmeanvariance model as an interpersonal game model where the investor optimally chooses the policy at any time t , on the premise that he or she has already decided his or her time-consistent policies…”
BackgroundTHE EFFECTS OF REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION RULES ON WITHDRAWALS FROM TRADITIONAL IRAs
Mortenson, J. A., Schramm, H. R., & Whitten, A. (2019) · National Tax Journal · doi:10.17310/ntj.2019.3.02 · Cited by 30
Efficiency and equilibrium when preferences are time-inconsistent
Luttmer, E. G. J., & Mariotti, T. (2005) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2005.07.004 · Cited by 30
“But when (1)Strotz [16] and Phelps and Pollak [13] initiated the study of additively separable preferences that exhibit time-inconsistency.”
Discount functions and self-control problems
Caliendo, F., & Findley, T. S. (2014) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2013.12.035 · Cited by 30
Sunk Cost as a Self-Management Device
Hong, F., Huang, W., & Zhao, X. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3032 · Cited by 30
“9See the seminal works by Strotz (1955) and Laibson (1997).”
Aggregation, Efficiency, and Measurement
Färe, R. G., Grosskopf, S., & Primont, D. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-47677-3 · Cited by 30
Discounting and Its Impact on Durables Buying Decisions
Winer, R. S. (1997) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1023/a:1007945629536 · Cited by 30
Productivity Versus Welfare; Or GDP Versus Weitzman's NDP
Oulton, N. (2004) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/j.0034-6586.2004.00129.x · Cited by 30
The effect of distributive goals on the time inconsistency of optimal taxes
Rogers, C. A. (1986) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(86)90031-0 · Cited by 30
Demand Discovery and Asset PricingPreprint
Gallmeyer, M. F., Seppi, D. J., & Hollifield, B. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.555602 · Cited by 30
“(3) 4Although the long-horizon investors’ time preferences are not constant over time, their optimization problem is still time-consistent in contrast to Strotz (1956).”
BackgroundResultRational framing effects: A multidisciplinary case
Bermúdez, J. L. (2022) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x2200005x · Cited by 34
Hyperbolic discounting and endogenous growth
Strulik, H. (2014) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2014.11.032 · Cited by 29
“Without further assumptions a time-variant discount rate implies the time-inconsistency of intertemporal plans (Strotz, 1956, Pollak, 1968).”
BackgroundOptimal equilibria for time‐inconsistent stopping problems in continuous time
Huang, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2019) · Mathematical Finance · doi:10.1111/mafi.12229 · Cited by 29
“Consistent planning in Strotz (1955) has been a widely accepted approach for time-inconsistent problems, when a decision maker (an agent) lacks sufficient control over his future selves’ behavior.”
BackgroundInfluentialLópez-Guzmán, S., Konova, A. B., & Glimcher, P. W. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0135 · Cited by 31
Johansson, P., & Kriström, B. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108660624 · Cited by 29
The pricing effects of ambiguous private information
Condie, S. S., & Ganguli, J. V. (2017) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2017.06.005 · Cited by 29
Draus, P., Roddy, J., & Greenwald, M. (2010) · Journal of Drug Issues · doi:10.1177/002204261004000405 · Cited by 32
“…to consume addictive goods has been hypothesized to be a result of myopia (Orphanides & Zervos, 1998; Pollak 1976), inconsistent time horizons (Strotz, 1956; Winston, 1980), the existence of two selves residing in one body (Thaler & Sheffrin, 1981), and rational addiction (Becker & Murphy,…”
BackgroundMasters of our time: Impatience and self-control in high-level chess games
Gränsmark, P. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.02.002 · Cited by 25
“For this reason, the 1 In his theoretical paper, Strotz (1956) was the first researcher to suggest that people are more impatient in the short run than in the long run.”
BackgroundGeneral time consistent discounting
Lattimore, T., & Hütter, M. (2013) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2013.09.022 · Cited by 29
“The latter has been partially addressed, with a positive result in [8,19,20,24].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRank-Dependent Utility and Risk Taking in Complete Markets
He, X. D., Kouwenberg, R. R. P., & Zhou, X. Y. (2017) · SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics · doi:10.1137/16m1072516 · Cited by 29
Income tax reform for a globalized world: The case for a dual income tax
Boadway, R. (2005) · Journal of Asian Economics · doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2005.10.001 · Cited by 29
“consumption is systematically too low early in life ( Strotz, 1956; Laibson,”
BackgroundDynamic Consistency and Non-Expected Utility
Segal, U. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5083-9_2 · Cited by 29
Self Confidence: Intrapersonal StrategiesPreprint
Bénabou, R., & Jean Tirole, Z. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.220788 · Cited by 31
The evolution and devolution of cognitive control: The costs of deliberation in a competitive world
Tomlin, D., Rand, D. G., Ludvig, E. A., & Cohen, J. D. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11002 · Cited by 28
Prevention and cure efforts both substitute and complement
Hennessy, D. A. (2007) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1270 · Cited by 28
Time-inconsistent stochastic linear quadratic control for discrete-time systems
Qi, Q., & Zhang, H. (2017) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-017-9167-3 · Cited by 28
If I can do it, so can you! Peer effects on perseverance
Buechel, B., Mechtenberg, L., & Petersen, J. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.09.004 · Cited by 28
“5 For theoretical contributions see, e.g., Strotz (1955), Thaler and Shefrin (1981), Ainslie and Haslam (1992), Laibson (1997), O’Donoghue and Rabin (1999), Gul and Pesendorfer (2001), Bénabou and Pycia (2002) , and Fudenberg and Levine (2006) .”
BackgroundOptimal stopping under model ambiguity: A time‐consistent equilibrium approach
Huang, Y., & Yu, X. (2021) · Mathematical Finance · doi:10.1111/mafi.12312 · Cited by 28
“To carry out consistent planning proposed in Strotz (1955), we follow the game-theoretic formulation in Section 2.1 of Huang and Zhou (2020b) (in line with Section 3.1 of Huang and NguyenHuu (2018)).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialContinuous Markov equilibria with quasi-geometric discounting
Chatterjee, S., & Eyigungor, B. (2016) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2016.02.009 · Cited by 28
“…decision-making (Battagliani and Coate (2008)), and nonunitary models of household decision-making (Hertzberg (2012)).1 Decision problems with quasi-geometric discounting must be analyzed as a dynamic game because of the implied time inconsistency of intertemporal preferences (Strotz (1956)).”
BackgroundEquilibrium Controls in Time Inconsistent Stochastic Linear Quadratic Problems
Wang, T. (2018) · Applied Mathematics & Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00245-018-9513-x · Cited by 28
Assessing bankruptcy reform in a model with temptation and equilibrium default
Nakajima, M. (2016) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.002 · Cited by 27
Observability Increases the Demand for Commitment Devices
Exley, C. L., & Naecker, J. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2501 · Cited by 28
“One popular explanation for this “deliberate regimenting of one’s future economic behavior” is that individuals have time-inconsistent preferences (Strotz, 1955).”
BackgroundLapses, conflict, and akrasia in torts and crimes: Towards an economic theory of the will
Cooter, R. D. (1991) · International Review of Law and Economics · doi:10.1016/0144-8188(91)90016-7 · Cited by 29
On the compassion of time-limited welfare programs
Fang, H., & Silverman, D. P. (2002) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(02)00183-4 · Cited by 28
“The literature on time-inconsistent preferences distinguishes between sophisticated and naive agents (Strotz 1955, Pollak 1968, O’Donoghue and Rabin 1999a, 1999b).”
BackgroundExpenditure taxes, income taxes, and time-inconsistency
Rogers, C. A. (1987) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/0047-2727(87)90013-2 · Cited by 28
Continuous-Time Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection: A Reinforcement Learning FrameworkPreprint
Wang, H., & Zhou, X. Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.11392 · Cited by 27
Variable Effects of Earnings Volatility on Food Stamp Participation
Moffitt, R., & Ribar, D. C. (2008) · doi:10.17848/9781435684126.ch3 · Cited by 27
Moving ego versus moving time: investigating the shared source of future-bias and near-bias
Baron, S., Everett, B. C., Latham, A. J., Miller, K., Tierney, H., & Oh, J. V. T. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04286-0 · Cited by 27
“3 Economists tend to disagree, arguing that near-bias is only irrational when it leads to dynamical inconsistency (e.g., Fishburn & Rubinstein, 1982; Koopmans, 1960; Lancaster, 1963; Strotz, 1955).”
BackgroundThe sustainable executive: antecedents of managerial long-term orientation
Sternad, D., & Kennelly, J. (2017) · Journal of Global Responsibility · doi:10.1108/jgr-04-2017-0026 · Cited by 22
Wang, C. X., Beck, J. T., & Yuan, H. (2021) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242921990351 · Cited by 29
“From a neoclassical economic perspective, consumers should want the highest pricing control possible to pay the lowest price possible (i.e., $0) (Allen 1938; Strotz 1955).”
BackgroundTime-Inconsistent Preferences and Strategic Self-Control in Digital Content Consumption
Zhang, S., Chan, T. Y., Luo, X., & Wang, X. (2021) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2021.1318 · Cited by 25
Micro‐costs: Inertia in Television Viewing
Esteves‐Sorenson, C., & Perretti, F. (2012) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02507.x · Cited by 26
“Strotz, R. H. (1956). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23 (62), 165–180. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Yale University Press. Webster, J., Phalen, P., & Lichty, L. (2006). Ratings analysis: Th…”
BackgroundInfluentialTemporal (In)Stability of Employee Preferences for Rewards
Wine, B., Gilroy, S. P., & Hantula, D. A. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1080/01608061.2012.646854 · Cited by 27
“For example, the stationarity axiom of standard economic rational choice theory (Fishburn & Rubinstein, 1982; Koopmans, 1960; Strotz, 1955) holds that preferences are constant and immutable, while economists Stigler and Becker (1977) point out that preferences are inconsistent, attributable to…”
BackgroundSpending-Biased Legislators: Discipline Through Disagreement *
Piguillem, F., & Riboni, A. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjv011 · Cited by 27
The place of entrepreneurship in “The Economics that Might Have Been”
Winter, S. G. (2016) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9701-5 · Cited by 27
“It is unsurprising, then, that the causal time-inversion problem has received some attention in mainstream literature going back to Strotz (1956), under the heading of timeinconsistency of preferences.”
BackgroundPlanning Problems for Sophisticated Agents with Present Bias
Kleinberg, J. M., Oren, S., & Raghavan, M. (2016) · ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC) · doi:10.1145/2940716.2940764 · Cited by 27
“…decision-making agents are naive, reasoning about the future without taking their bias into account, there is considerable evidence that people often behave in ways that are sophisticated with respect to present bias, making plans based on the belief that they will be present-biased in the future.”
BackgroundMixture models of delay discounting and smoking behavior
Hofmeyr, A., Monterosso, J. R., Dean, A. C., Morales, A. M., Bilder, R. M., Sabb, F. W., & London, E. D. (2016) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2016.1198797 · Cited by 27
“The functional form of the relationship between time and perceived value has bearing on the formulation of discounting as an operationalization of impulsivity (1,12).”
BackgroundTime-Inconsistent Optimal Control Problems and Related Issues
Wei, Y., & Yong, J. (2019) · The IMA volumes in mathematics and its applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25498-8_22 · Cited by 31
Kihlstrom, R. E. (2008) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2008.08.008 · Cited by 27
Ross, D. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51676-3.50023-3 · Cited by 26
“This idea of representing people as communities of agents ‐ synchronic, diachronic or both at once ‐ goes back to the very dawn of BE ( Strotz 1956 ), and so has some claim to being regarded as among its basic points of departure from neoclassicism.”
The Evolution of Labour Markets1
Lal, D. K. (2004) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275793.003.0009 · Cited by 26
Pareto-improving tax policies under hyperbolic discounting
Kang, M. (2018) · International Tax and Public Finance · doi:10.1007/s10797-018-9527-y · Cited by 27
Role of Information in Decision Making of Social Agents
Yukalov, V. I., & Sornette, D. (2014) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622014500564 · Cited by 34
“…fallacy (Tversky and Kahneman, 1983; Shafir et al., 1990), the isolation effects (McCaffery and Baron, 2006), the combined paradoxes (Yukalov and Sornette, 2009b, 2010b, 2011), the planning paradox (Kydland and Prescott, 1977), and dynamic inconsistency (Strotz, 1955; Frederick et al., 2002).”
Consumption–investment strategies with non-exponential discounting and logarithmic utility
Zhao, Q., Shen, Y., & Wei, J. (2014) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.04.034 · Cited by 26
The Welfare Effects of Energy Efficiency Standards When Choice Sets Matter
TSVETANOV, T. G., & Segerson, K. (2014) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/676036 · Cited by 26
Hyperbolic discounting and time inconsistency in a native–exotic species conflict
Settle, C. E., & Shogren, J. F. (2004) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.11.010 · Cited by 26
Read, D. (2007) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593107073845 · Cited by 25
“Many researchers have proposed alternatives to the DU model based on the notion that immediate utility is given disproportionate weight relative to delayed utility (Ainslie, 1975, 1991; Becker & Mulligan, 1997; Harvey, 1994; Herrnstein, 1997; Kirby, 1997; Loewenstein & Prelec, 1992; Mazur, 1987; Strotz, 1956 ).”
BackgroundBetting on weight loss … and losing: personal gambles as commitment mechanisms
Burger, N. E., & Lynham, J. M. (2010) · Applied Economics Letters · doi:10.1080/00036840902845442 · Cited by 31
Framing effects in intertemporal choice: A nudge experiment
Faralla, V., Novarese, M., & Ardizzone, A. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2017.09.002 · Cited by 29
Intergenerational discounting: A case from Hong Kong
Chau, K. W., Wong, S. K., Yiu, C. Y., et al. (2008) · The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) · doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.08.015 · Cited by 26
I Was Pleased a Moment Ago: How Pleasure Varies with Background and Foreground Reference Points
Heyman, J., Mellers, B. A., Tishcenko, S., & Schwartz, A. (2004) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/b:moem.0000027278.22201.68 · Cited by 24
“Myopia occurs in choices as well as emotions (Strotz, 1955).”
BackgroundEnvironmental policy under a non-market discount rate
Horowitz, J. K. (1996) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/0921-8009(95)00082-8 · Cited by 26
“The behavioral approach is due to Strotz (1956), which remains interesting and instructive 40 years on.”
MethodAn Economic Model of the Planning Fallacy
Brunnermeier, M., Papakonstantinou, F., & Parker, J. A. (2008) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w14228 · Cited by 27
“In terms of performance, Ariely andWertenbroch (2002) finds that subjects given an externallyimposed (equally-spaced) deadline performed better (as measured by the course grade in the first study and by the number of errors detected in the second study) than subjects that selfimposed a deadline.”
Optimal Policy Instruments for Externality-Producing Durable Goods Under Time Inconsistency
Heutel, G. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w17083 · Cited by 38
Psychology and the MarketPreprint
Glaeser, E. L. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.477982 · Cited by 26
Global Warming and Hyperbolic DiscountingPreprint
Karp, L. S. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.410028 · Cited by 23
Temptation and TaxationPreprint
Krusell, P. L., Kuruşçu, B., & Smith, A. A. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.519502 · Cited by 26
Identification of Time-Inconsistent Models: The Case of Insecticide Treated Nets
Mahajan, A., Michel, C., & Tarozzi, A. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27198 · Cited by 26
Led into Temptation? Rewarding Brand Logos Bias the Neural Encoding of Incidental Economic Decisions
Murawski, C., Harris, P. G., Bode, S., D, J. F. D., & Egan, G. F. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034155 · Cited by 27
“increases linearly in the delay [14,67,68].”
Quantifying the subjective cost of self-control in humans
Raio, C. M., & Glimcher, P. W. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2018726118 · Cited by 25
Repeated moral hazard with a time-inconsistent agent
Yılmaz, M. (2013) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.08.010 · Cited by 25
“λ = p1h (uh) + (1− p1)h(ul) (22) μ = p1(1− p1)(h(uh)− h(ul)) (23) (22)Here, I stick to the original discrete 3-period model with t = 0, 1, 2 where t = 0 is the contracting stage with no effort choice is made.”
Patterns and Predictors of Debt: A Panel Study, 1985-2008
Caputo, R. K. (2012) · The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare · doi:10.15453/0191-5096.3664 · Cited by 25
“The study explores whether poverty and absent parenthood in one’s early upbringing, theorized as imparting a greater sense of present-orientation than of delaying gratification, are robust predictors of later life indebtedness (Strotz, 1956).”
BackgroundWalking the Line between Goals and Temptations: Asymmetric Effects of Counteractive Control
Fishbach, A., & Converse, B. A. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195391381.003.0021 · Cited by 25
“1992; Green & Rachlin, 1996; Rachlin & Green, 1972; Schelling, 1984; Strotz, 1956; Thaler,”
Barboza, G. (2018) · Economic Notes · doi:10.1111/ecno.12106 · Cited by 24
Equilibrium strategies for time-inconsistent stochastic switching systems
Mei, H., & Yong, J. (2018) · ESAIM Control Optimisation and Calculus of Variations · doi:10.1051/cocv/2018051 · Cited by 25
Personal identity and standard economic theory
Davis, J. B. (1995) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/13501789500000002 · Cited by 25
Lal, D. K. (2004) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275793.001.0001 · Cited by 23
Time-Inconsistency and Welfare
Bhattacharya, J., & Lakdawalla, D. (2004) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w10345 · Cited by 25
Discounting Time and Time Discounting: Subjective Time Perception and Intertemporal PreferencesPreprint
Zauberman, G., Kim, B. K., Malkoc, S. A., et al. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2164506 · Cited by 25
Mian, A., Straub, L., & Sufi, A. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26940 · Cited by 24
“The earliest models of optimal consumption behavior that we know of and that allow for such preferences are Strotz (1956), Koopmans (1960) and Uzawa (1968).”
Optimal redistributive pensions and the cost of self-control
St-Amant, P.-A. B., & Garon, J. (2014) · International Tax and Public Finance · doi:10.1007/s10797-014-9331-2 · Cited by 13
Non-zero-sum reinsurance and investment game between two mean-variance insurers under the CEV model
Zhu, H., Cao, M., & Ying, Z. (2020) · Optimization · doi:10.1080/02331934.2020.1789130 · Cited by 24
“To overcome this difficulty, we follow the idea pioneered by Strotz [42] to tackle each player’s optimization problem in an embedded game.”
MethodMarkov decision processes with quasi-hyperbolic discounting
Jaśkiewicz, A., & Nowak, A. S. (2020) · Finance and Stochastics · doi:10.1007/s00780-020-00443-2 · Cited by 24
A quasi-hyperbolic discounting approach to smoking behavior
Ida, T. (2014) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-014-0005-7 · Cited by 28
Operant Matching as a Nash Equilibrium of an Intertemporal Game
Loewenstein, Y., Prelec, D., & Seung, H. S. (2009) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2009.09-08-854 · Cited by 24
“4The multiple-selves approach is also the standard solution to the problem of optimal choice in the MDP case when discounting is nonexponential (Laibson, 1997; Strotz, 1955).”
BackgroundSun, Z., & Guo, X. (2019) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10957-018-01471-x · Cited by 24
Behavioral criminology and public policy
Loughran, T. A. (2019) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12465 · Cited by 28
Path dependent Feynman–Kac formula for forward backward stochastic Volterra integral equations
Wang, H., Yong, J., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Annales de l Institut Henri Poincaré Probabilités et Statistiques · doi:10.1214/21-aihp1158 · Cited by 24
“See the seminal paper Strotz [56], and early follow-up works of Pollak [50] and Laibson [36].”
MethodDeveloping Behavior Change Interventions
Hankonen, N. E., & Hardeman, W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.021 · Cited by 28
Jaśkiewicz, A., & Nowak, A. S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44374-4_33 · Cited by 24
Vyse, S. (2013) · The Behavior Analyst · doi:10.1007/bf03392295 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Strotz, R. H.
- Corresponding author
- Strotz, R. H.
- Venue
- The Review of Economic Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1955
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 165
- ISSN
- 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4251562186
- Cited by
- 2,834
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 140 · 2020: 171 · 2019: 149 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 111 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 93
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Review of Economic Studies (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- myopia, inconsistency, time preference, intertemporal choice, consumer behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review