The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Econometric Evaluation of Linear Macro-Economic Models
Abstract
Macro-economic models are generally designed to achieve a multiplicity of objectives and correspondingly, they have been evaluated using a vast range of statistical, econometric, economic, political and even aesthetic criteria. However, in so far as they claim to represent economic behaviour, empirical macro-economic systems are certainly open to direct evaluation and testing against data information. The last few years have witnessed a substantial growth in the literature on econometric evaluation techniques, but despite important improvements in formalising evaluation procedures and their increased scope, formidable problems confront any investigation of a high dimensional, non-linear, stochastic, dynamic structure. Since system characteristics are the prime concern of economy-wide models, it might be the case that the validity of every individual component is not essential to adequate overall performance. While this viewpoint is debatable it does draw attention to the need for system evaluation procedures, at which point data limitations pose serious constraints on formal tests. Thus a new “limited information” test of forecast encompassing is proposed, based only on forecasts and requiring no other data from a model's proprietors. The derivation, merits and drawbacks of such a test are presented together with some suggestions for testing entailed relationships and inter-equation feedbacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Cited by
Forecasting Volatility in Financial Markets: A Review
Poon, S., & Granger, C. W. J. (2003) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/002205103765762743 · Cited by 1,315
Chapter 4 Forecast Combinations
Timmermann, A. (2006) · Handbook of Economic Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s1574-0706(05)01004-9 · Cited by 1,314
Hendry, D. F., & Clements, M. P. (2004) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1368-423x.2004.00119.x · Cited by 466
Self-citationForecast combinations: An over 50-year review
Wang, X., Hyndman, R. J., Li, F., & Kang, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.11.005 · Cited by 280
West, K. D. (2006) · Handbook of Economic Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s1574-0706(05)01003-7 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Chong, Y. Y., & Hendry, D. F.
- Venue
- The Review of Economic Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 671
- ISSN
- 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047196406
- Cited by
- 601
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Econometric Evaluation of Linear Macro-Economic Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2297611
- The paper
- Chong, Y. Y., & Hendry, D. F. (1986). Econometric Evaluation of Linear Macro-Economic Models. The Review of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.