Cited by 338Occupational and Professional Licensing RegulationMerger and Competition AnalysisLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Investment, Moral Hazard, and Occupational Licensing

Shapiro, Carl·1986·The Review of Economic Studies

Abstract

I analyse occupational licensing as an input regulation that requires minimum levels of human capital investment by professionals. By raising professionals' training levels, licensing helps alleviate moral hazard problems associated with the provision of high quality services. I also consider certification, whereby consumers are provided information about professionals' training levels. I show that licensing and certification tend to benefit consumers who value quality highly at the expense of those who do not. Licensing may raise total surplus if sellers' investments are not observable, but is Pareto-worsening if training levels are observable. Certification may, however, lead to excessive investment as a signalling device, and thus be Pareto Inferior to either licensing or to a policy of laissez-faire.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2297722

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Occupational licensing could benefit consumers and protect their health and safety through quality improvement.

    “Occupational licensing could benefit consumers and protect their health and safety through quality improvement (Kleiner, 2000; Shapiro, 1986).”
  • Licensing requirements could have stimulated the formation of human capital and prevented the least competent midwives from practicing.

    “Licensing requirements could have stimulated the formation of human capital and prevented the least competent midwives from practicing (Shapiro 1986).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shapiro, C.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, Carl
Venue
The Review of Economic Studies
Published
1986-10
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
843
ISSN
0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046126098
Cited by
338
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Review of Economic Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
professional licensing, moral hazard, human capital investment, certification, signaling, consumer surplus, Pareto optimality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review