Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,318

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle

Open access
Lee, Charles M. C., Shleifer, Andrei, Thaler, Richard H.·1991·The Journal of Finance

Abstract

This paper examines the proposition that fluctuations in discounts of closed-end funds are driven by changes in individual investor sentiment. The theory implies that discounts on various funds move together, that new funds get started when seasoned funds sell at a premium or a small discount, and that discounts are correlated with prices of other securities affected by the same investor sentiment. The evidence supports these predictions. In particular, we find that both closed-end funds and small stocks tend to be held by individual investors, and that the discounts on closed-end funds narrow when small stocks do well.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2328690

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,318

Metadata

Authors
Lee, C. M. C., Shleifer, A., & Thaler, R. H.
Venue
The Journal of Finance
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1991-03
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
75
ISSN
0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052758069
Cited by
1,318
References
0
FWCI
28.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2328690
The paper
Lee, C. M. C., Shleifer, A., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328690

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.