The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Examination of the Robustness of the Weekend Effect
Abstract
This paper analyzes the robustness of the day-of-the-week (DOW) and weekend effects to alternative estimation and testing procedures. The results show that sample size can distort the interpretation of classical test statistics unless the significance level is adjusted downward. Specification tests reveal widespread departures from OLS assumptions. Hypothesis tests results are reported using robust econometric methods and a GARCH model. The strength of the DOW and weekend effect evidence appears to depend on the estimation and testing method. Both effects seem to have disappeared by 1975.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity
White, H. (1980) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912934 · Cited by 25,861
Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity
Bollerslev, T. (1986) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1 · Cited by 22,254
Engle, R. F. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912773 · Cited by 20,795
David, F. N., & Tukey, J. W. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529486 · Cited by 12,708
The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices
Fama, E. F. (1965) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/294743 · Cited by 8,664
Robust estimation of a location parameter
Huber, P. J. (1964) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703732 · Cited by 7,228
Regression Diagnostics -- Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Beaumont, C. D., Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1981) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2581267 · Cited by 6,359
Testing Statistical Hypotheses
(2021) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119243830.ch12 · Cited by 5,106
The variation of certain speculative prices
Mandelbrot, B. B. (1997) · Fractals and Scaling in Finance · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2763-0_14 · Cited by 4,468
The theory and practice of econometrics
(1986) · Journal of Macroeconomics · doi:10.1016/0164-0704(86)90027-3 · Cited by 4,342
Cited by
FAMA, E. F. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x · Cited by 5,350
Bollerslev, T., Chou, R. Y., & Kroner, K. F. (1992) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90064-x · Cited by 4,270
FAMA, E. F. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2328565 · Cited by 1,271
Losing sleep at the market: The daylight saving anomaly
Kamstra, M. J., Kramer, L. A., & Levi, M. D. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.1005 · Cited by 494
International Evidence on the Robustness of the Day-of-the-Week Effect
Chang, E. C., Pinegar, J. M., & Ravichandran, R. (1993) · The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.2307/2331162 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Connolly, R. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133
- ISSN
- 0022-1090 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157564530
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 16.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Examination of the Robustness of the Weekend Effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2330769
- The paper
- Connolly, R. A. (1989). An Examination of the Robustness of the Weekend Effect. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330769
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.