The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fluctuating Confidence in Stock Markets: Implications for Returns and Volatility
Abstract
The average relative profitability of different firms in the economy jumps erratically. Al? though investors are unable to observe these productivity switches, they continuously update their beliefs regarding high and low productivity firms by observing the total return on each firm, which consists of the average productivity plus noise. The portfolio choices, interest rate, and stock return processes are derived in a Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (1985a) style general equilibrium model. Three stylized facts of stock market returns are addressed: negative skewness, excess kurtosis, and predictive asymmetry (excess returns and future changes in volatility are negatively correlated). To measure the last stylized fact, an EGARCH model is fitted to sample paths simulated from the model. Parameter values that permit faster learning fit the three facts better. I. Introduction This paper has three purposes. First, it presents the special properties of a filter in continuous time that characterizes the dynamics of Bayesian learning about recurrent profitability switches and their relation to fluctuating confidence. Second, the paper shows how fluctuating confidence, which arises due to this up? dating process, is reflected in the statistical properties of interest rate and stock return processes in a Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (1985a and b) (henceforth, CIR) stochas? tic production economy. Portfolio adjustments to hedge the exposure of the risk associated with these fluctuations are discussed. Finally, the paper draws some re? lationships between the speed of learning and the ability of the model to replicate three stylized facts about stock market returns. I argue that the often used Kalman filtering problem is not suitable to model fluctuating confidence and to replicate the three stylized facts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stock Market Overreactions to Bad News in Good Times: A Rational Expectations Equilibrium Model
Veronesi, P. (1999) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/12.5.975 · Cited by 998
Oil shocks, policy uncertainty and stock market return
Kang, W., & Ratti, R. A. (2013) · Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money · doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2013.07.001 · Cited by 503
Ambiguity, Learning, and Asset Returns
(2012) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta7618 · Cited by 404
Model Uncertainty and Option Markets with Heterogeneous Beliefs
BURASCHI, A., & JILTSOV, A. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01006.x · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- David, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 427
- ISSN
- 0022-1090 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010315157
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluctuating Confidence in Stock Markets: Implications for Returns and Volatility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2331232
- The paper
- David, A. (1997). Fluctuating Confidence in Stock Markets: Implications for Returns and Volatility. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331232
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.