The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Methods in Practice: Experiences in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Abstract
A. Racine, A. P. Grieve, H. Fluhler, A. F. M. Smith, Bayesian Methods in Practice: Experiences in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), Vol. 35, No. 2 (1986), pp. 93-150
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Two-Period Change-Over Design and Its Use in Clinical Trials
Grizzle, J. E. (1965) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2528104 · Cited by 784
Cited by
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty
Draper, D. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02015.x · Cited by 1,599
15 Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials
Kenward, M. G., & Jones, B. (2007) · Handbook of Statistics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7161(07)27015-4 · Cited by 871
Population Pharmacokinetics/Dynamics*
Sheiner, L. B., & Ludden, T. M. (1992) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pa.32.040192.001153 · Cited by 316
A New Perspective on Priors for Generalized Linear Models
Bedrick, E. J., Christensen, R., & Johnson, W. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476713 · Cited by 271
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Methods in Practice: Experiences in the Pharmaceutical Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2347264
- The paper
- Racine, A., Grieve, A. P., Fluhler, H., & Smith, A. F. M. (1986). Bayesian Methods in Practice: Experiences in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Applied Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347264
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
