Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Regression Analysis of Relative Survival Rates

Hakulinen, T., Tenkanen, L.·1987·Applied Statistics

Abstract

Survival from cancer or other chronic diseases is often measured using the relative survival rate. This, in turn, is defined as the ratio of the observed survival rate in the patient group under consideration to the expected survival rate in a group taken from the general population. At the beginning of the follow-up period, apart from the disease under study, factors affecting survival (e.g. age and sex) should be similar in the two groups. This paper outlines how a proportional hazards regression model may be adapted to the relative survival rates using GLIM. The method is illustrated by data on lung cancer patients diagnosed in Finland in 1 968-1 970.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2347789

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Hakulinen, T., & Tenkanen, L.
Venue
Applied Statistics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
309
ISSN
0035-9254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2510199337
Cited by
246
References
0
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regression Analysis of Relative Survival Rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2347789
The paper
Hakulinen, T., & Tenkanen, L. (1987). Regression Analysis of Relative Survival Rates. Applied Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347789

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.