The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Test Theory for a New Generation of Tests.
Abstract
Contents: R.J. Mislevy, Introduction. R.E. Snow, D.F. Lohman, Cognitive Psychology, New Test Design, and New Test Theory: An Introduction. R.J. Mislevy, Foundations of a New Test Theory. D.F. Lohman, M.J. Ippel, Cognitive Diagnosis: From Statistically Based Assessment Toward Theory-Based Assessment. N.S. Cole, Comments on Chapters 1-3. D. Thissen, Repealing Rules That No Longer Apply to Psychological Measurement. R.E. Bennett, Toward Intelligent Assessment: An Integration of Constructed-Response Testing, Artificial Intelligence, and Model-Based Measurement. S. Embretson, Psychometric Models for Learning and Cognitive Processes. B.F. Green, Comments on Chapters 4-6. S.P. Marshall, Assessing Schema Knowledge. P.J. Feltovich, R.J. Spiro, R.L. Coulson, Learning, Teaching, and Testing for Complex Conceptual Understanding. G.N. Masters, R.J. Mislevy, New Views of Student Learning: Implications for Educational Measurement. D.H. Gitomer, D. Rock, Addressing Process Variables in Test Analysis. J.B. Carroll, Comments on Chapters 7-10. K. Yamamoto, D.H. Gitomer, Application of a HYBRID Model to a Test of Cognitive Skill Representation. J.B. Carroll, Test Theory and the Behavioral Scaling of Test Performance. I.I. Bejar, A Generative Approach to Psychological and Educational Measurement. E.H. Haertel, D.E. Wiley, Representations of Ability Structures: Implications for Testing. H.I. Braun, Comments on Chapters 11-14.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198
A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment
Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1503_5 · Cited by 973
Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis From the Angle of Assessment
Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075001027 · Cited by 917
Methodology Review: Evaluating Person Fit
Meijer, R. R., & Sijtsma, K. (2001) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466210122031957 · Cited by 417
Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge
(1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0657-3 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Gudgeon, A. C., Fredericksen, N., Mislevy, R., & Bejar, I. I.
- Venue
- The Statistician
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 601
- ISSN
- 0039-0526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1560650794
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Test Theory for a New Generation of Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2348147
- The paper
- Gudgeon, A. C., Fredericksen, N., Mislevy, R., & Bejar, I. I. (1994). Test Theory for a New Generation of Tests. The Statistician. https://doi.org/10.2307/2348147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.