Cited by 8Indian and Buddhist StudiesJapanese History and CultureStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Daruma-shu, Dogen and Soto Zen

Faure, Bernard·1987·Monumenta Nipponica

Abstract

The Daruma-shii, Dbgen, and Sdtb Zen Y OSAI (or Eisai) %pi,1141-1215, and Dogen SZ, 1200-1253, are traditionally considered the first Buddhist monks to have introduced Zen to Japan.Ddgen, in particular, has been lavishly praised as the founder of the Soto %@Isect and, more recently, as one of the greatest Japanese thinkers.His role has been reevaluated in postwar scholarship, and numerous studies have examined different aspects of his thought and personality.Such an emphasis on Ddgen's life and thought neglects the ideological purposes behind his accepted image; it obscures, in fact, the history of Japanese Buddhism.Traditions, in Husserl's words, are 'a forgetting of the origin'.It has become clear in recent years that Dogen's role cannot be properly understood without taking into account the existence of the so-called Bodhidharma School, or Daruma-shu gE%.This school, allegedly founded by a little-known figure called Dainichi Nonin k EIBEZ,who flourished toward the end of the twelfth century, had reached a wide audience by the beginning of the Kamakura period, and for that reason became increasingly unpopular among the Buddhist establishment.'It was perceived as a powerful rival by the Kamakura 'new sects', and more particularly by the Zen and Nichiren schools.This led to a repression that eventually brought an end to the Daruma-shu as a formal school, but this did not eradicate its influence on Japanese Bud-THE AUTHOR is assistant professor in the from this tradition, and it does not seem Department of Asian Studies, Cornell necessary to draw an overly clear-cut distinc-University.tion between the new movement and the Following Okubo DbshCi k A # Z & , earlier Ch'an school, just as it is unnecessaryJapanese scholars refer to it as the Japanese to specify Japanese Rinzai or Sbtb when re-Bodhidharma school (Nihon Daruma-shn) to ferring to the teachings of Dbgen and Ybsai.distinguish it from its Chinese counterpart, Implicit in the denomination is the fact the Ta-mo tsung &%j5%, that is, the early that, while the latter's teachings belong to Ch'an school that had been introduced into the Ch'an tradition, Nbnin's teachings are Japan during the Nara period and had been divorced from it by their Japanese ideokept alive within the Tendai tradition.syncracies.However, Nbnin's teaching clearly stemmed and Takahashi fluenced Japanese poetry, judging from the Shiiei.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2385038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Faure, B.
Venue
Monumenta Nipponica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
25
ISSN
0027-0741 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4253273156
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Monumenta Nipponica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Japanese History and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Dōgen, Eisai, Sōtō Zen, Bodhidharma, Zen Buddhism, Japanese Buddhism, Kamakura period, Nichiren, Rinzai Zen, history of Japanese Buddhism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review