Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Seed Dispersal in Flood Plain Forests of Amazonia

Kubitzki, Klaus, Ziburski, Albrecht·1994·Biotropica

Abstract

Seed dispersal in the seasonally inundated flood plain forests of whitewater (varzea) and blackwater rivers (igap6) of Central Amazonia was investigated in a two year field study with particular attention being paid to the phenology of the constituent tree species and the role of water and fish in the dissemination of their diaspores. Maximum fruiting of the trees coincides with the period of inundation, and the specific timing of diaspore release appears related to special dispersal mechanisms, dormancy, and/or requirements for germination and seedling establishment. Due to the possession of specific tissues or other devices that provide buoyancy, the diaspores of most tree species of the inundated forests are capable of floating for prolonged periods. A comparison of diaspore characteristics between hydrochorous tree species and their congeners in noninundated habitats reveals recurrent patterns: some lineages that in noninundated habitats possess dehiscent fruits with anemochorous or zoochorous seeds, in inundatable habitats switch to the production of hydrochorous seeds. Other lineages that in noninundated habitats have dehiscent fruits, in inundatable habitats switch to the production of indehiscent hydrochorous fruits. Lineages that in noninundated habitats produce indehiscent fruits remain indehiscent when switching to hydrochory in inundatable habitats. In the inundated forests virtually all diaspores that fall into the water are consumed by fish, with rates of destruction differing greatly. Catfish cannot disrupt hard protective layers of seeds and fruits, while characins are destructive and act largely as seed predators. Very small diaspores, such as those of Cecropia, pass the gut of characin fish unimpaired and viable; for larger diaspores the rate of destruction seems to decrease with the age of the consuming fish. Most hydrochorous diaspores can be dispersed by fish, if they are not destroyed by them (facultative ichthyochory). Others depend on fish for dispersal (obligatory ichthyochory), for example, because their diaspores are very heavy and would sink to the ground under the parent tree, or because their seeds are enclosed in a hard shell from which they can be freed only by the jaws of characins. Ultimately, the diaspores dispersed by water or fish sink to the bottom of the inundated forests from where they start germinating shortly after the end of the submersion. It is most likely that the dormancy of many kinds of seeds is broken by their exposure to the hypoxic conditions that prevail in the still water. Evolutionarily, the synchronization of fruiting at high water must have preceded the origin of the adaptations for hydrochory, ichthyochory, and germination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2389108

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Kubitzki, K., & Ziburski, A.
Venue
Biotropica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-03
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
30
ISSN
0006-3606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032625346
Cited by
345
References
0
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seed Dispersal in Flood Plain Forests of Amazonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2389108
The paper
Kubitzki, K., & Ziburski, A. (1994). Seed Dispersal in Flood Plain Forests of Amazonia. Biotropica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.