The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlates of Whistle-Blowers' Perceptions of Organizational Retaliation
Abstract
1 Since whistle-blowing may also occur in nonbureaucratic organizations, our study was not limited to bureaucratic organizations. The process of public whistle-blowing and the organizational responses to it are explored, with particular emphasis on retaliation. Individuals who had filed complaints of unfair employment discrimination completed questionnaires about the organizational retaliation that followed their whistle-blowing. Correlation and regression analyses revealed that organizations were more likely to retaliate both against whistle-blowers who were valued by the organization because of their age, experience, or education, and against whistle-blowers whose cases lacked public support, than against other whistle-blowers.*
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0849-1 · Cited by 854
No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community.
Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994) · doi:10.1037/10156-000 · Cited by 617
Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (2013) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12040 · Cited by 78
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Parmerlee, M. A., Near, J. P., & Jensen, T. C.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2322410351
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlates of Whistle-Blowers' Perceptions of Organizational Retaliation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2392544
- The paper
- Parmerlee, M. A., Near, J. P., & Jensen, T. C. (1982). Correlates of Whistle-Blowers' Perceptions of Organizational Retaliation. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392544
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
