The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4310758 · Cited by 1,426
Distributed Leadership in Organizations: A Review of Theory and Research
Bolden, R. (2011) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x · Cited by 1,227
Umbrella Advocates Versus Validity Police: A Life-Cycle Model
Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.199 · Cited by 609
An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems
Weill, P., & Olson, M. H. (1989) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1989.11517849 · Cited by 351
Smart Products: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Directions*
Raff, S., Wentzel, D., & Obwegeser, N. (2020) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12544 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Astley, W. G.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 497
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4234744697
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2392694
- The paper
- Astley, W. G. (1985). Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392694
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
