The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy
Abstract
Funding for this research was provided to Professor Galaskiewicz by the Program for Nonprofit Organizations at Yale University and the National Science Foundation (SES-8008570) and to Professor Burt by Columbia University's Faculty Development Program, the National Science Foundation (SES-8208203), and consulting revenues to the Research Program in Structural Analysis. The discussion has been improved in response to comments from Roberto Fernandez, Mark Mizruchi, Gerald Salancik, Thomas Schqtt, and the ASO referees. Two network contagion models are used to describe corporate contributions officers' evaluations of nonprofit organizations seeking philanthropic donations. Contagion by cohesion predicts that behavioral communication between contributions officers results in their sharing the same evaluation. Contagion by structural equivalence predicts that symbolic communication via role playing between officers similarly positioned in the interorganization network of contributions officers results in similar evaluations. We find strong evidence of contagion, robust over differences in the evaluated nonprofit organizations and differences between officers. The evidence is overwhelmingly of contagion by structural equivalence.'
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Cited by
Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s
Davis, G. F., & Greve, H. R. (1997) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/231170 · Cited by 1,237
Doing good deeds in times of need: a strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations
Muller, A., & Kräussl, R. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.917 · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Authors
- Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2323582883
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
