The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What Theory is Not, Theorizing Is
Abstract
Products of the theorizing process seldonn emerge as full-blown theories, which means that most of what passes for theory in organizational studies consists of approximations. Although these approximations vary in their generality, few of them take the form of strong theory, and most of them can be read as texts created "in lieu of " strong theories. These substitutes for theory may result from lazy theorizing in which people try to graft theory onto stark sets of data. But they may also represent interim struggles in which people intentionally inch toward stronger theories. The products of laziness and intense struggles may look the same and may consist of references, data, lists, diagrams, and hypotheses. To label these five as "not theory " makes sense if the problem is laziness and incompetence. But ruling out those same five may slow inquiry if the problem is
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259140 · Cited by 4,544
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275112457914 · Cited by 4,349
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306
Mechanisms linking work and family: clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs
Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259269 · Cited by 1,044
Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations
Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2020) · Australian Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0312896219871976 · Cited by 997
Metadata
- Authors
- Weick, K. E.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994104530
- Cited by
- 1,367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Theory is Not, Theorizing Is. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2393789
- The paper
- Weick, K. E. (1995). What Theory is Not, Theorizing Is. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.