The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Model of Coping with Role Conflict: The Role Behavior of College Educated Women
Abstract
A model of role conflict coping behavior is presented based upon three levels in the role process. Type I coping, structural role redefinition, involves altering external, structurally imposed expectations relative to a person's position. Type II coping is personal role redefinition, changing one's expectations and perception of one's own behavior in a given position. Type III coping, reactive role behavior, entails attempting to find ways to meet all role expectations, assuming that demands are unchangeable and must be met. Through a pilot sample and a subsequent survey of college educated women, sixteen specific behavioral strategies are identified and classified under these three general types. The relat onship between coping behavior and satisfaction is explored both in bivariate and moderator analyses. The results indicate that the simple act of coping (as opposed to noncoping) may be more strongly related to satisfaction in women than the particular type of coping strategy employed.'
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
A theoretical model of career subidentity development in organizational settings
Hall, D. T. (1971) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(71)90005-5 · Cited by 353
Self-citationWorking Wives and Marriage Happiness
Orden, S. R., & Bradburn, N. M. (1969) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/224664 · Cited by 119
Organizational Role as a Risk Factor in Coronary Disease
Sales, S. M. (1969) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391126 · Cited by 114
Born Female: The High Cost of Keeping Women Down
Bernard, J. S., & Bird, C. (1969) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/350022 · Cited by 47
Cited by
Sources of Conflict Between Work and Family Roles
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4277352 · Cited by 4,788
Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance
Clark, S. C. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700536001 · Cited by 3,203
Recent Developments in Role Theory
Biddle, B. J. (1986) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435 · Cited by 2,358
Gender differences in work-family conflict
Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.60 · Cited by 782
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000246 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, D. T.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1972-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 471
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096876648
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Model of Coping with Role Conflict: The Role Behavior of College Educated Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2393827
- The paper
- Hall, D. T. (1972). A Model of Coping with Role Conflict: The Role Behavior of College Educated Women. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.