The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accounting for Teamwork: A Critical Study of Group-Based Systems of Organizational Control
Abstract
Mahmoud Ezzamel, Hugh Willmott, Accounting for Teamwork: A Critical Study of Group-Based Systems of Organizational Control, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 2, Special Issue: Critical Perspectives on Organizational Control (Jun., 1998), pp. 358-396
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Rethinking Management and Managerial Work: Capitalism, Control, and Subjectivity
Willmott, H. (1997) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679705001101 · Cited by 157
Self-citation
Cited by
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732
The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806 · Cited by 1,364
Management paradoxes: A relational view
Clegg, S. R., da Cunha, J. V., & e Cunha, M. P. (2002) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726702555001 · Cited by 498
Order and accounting as a performative ritual: evidence from ancient Egypt
Ezzamel, M. (2009) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.07.004 · Cited by 115
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 358
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088816329
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
