Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 549

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Bases of Angiosperm Phylogeny: Palynology

Open access
Walker, James W., Doyle, James A.·1975·Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Abstract

The field of palynology is reviewed in terms of its contributions to angiosperm systematics and phylogeny.Principal pollen characters which are phylogenetically useful at higher taxonomic levels (including aperture type, pollen wall architecture, pollen-unit, polarity, symmetry, shape, and grain size), and their evolutionary trends are examined.Many palynological characters and concepts are subjected to re-examination, particularly in an evolutionaryphylogenetic context.An attempt is made to show how pollen characters correlate with various higher categories of the Takhtajan and Cronquist systems of angiosperm classification and to outline certain phylogenetic trends observed in the pollen of different groups of angiosperms.With some exceptions, pollen morphology is consistent with the levels of relative advancement and the relationships postulated in the Takhtajan and Cronquist systems.Angiosperm pollen grains are clearly divisible into two fundamentally different types (each with its own derivatives ) : heteropolar, bilateral, boat-shaped monosulcate pollen versus isopolar, radiosymmetric, globose tricolpate pollen."Gymnospermous" monosulcate pollen and derivative types (ulcerate, disulculate, etc.) characterize both the putatively primitive dicotyledonous subclass Magnoliidae and the monocotyledons.The six non-magnoliid dicotyledonous subclasses, on the other hand, are characterized by tricolpate pollen and derivative types (tricolporate, triporate, rugate, etc.).Relatively primitive tricolpate pollen is retained by many Ranunculidae, 1J.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2395271

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 549

Metadata

Authors
Walker, J. W., & Doyle, J. A.
Venue
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1975
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
664
ISSN
0026-6493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051714356
Cited by
549
References
8
FWCI
16.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Bases of Angiosperm Phylogeny: Palynology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2395271
The paper
Walker, J. W., & Doyle, J. A. (1975). The Bases of Angiosperm Phylogeny: Palynology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. https://doi.org/10.2307/2395271

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.