The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Bases of Angiosperm Phylogeny: Palynology
Open accessAbstract
The field of palynology is reviewed in terms of its contributions to angiosperm systematics and phylogeny.Principal pollen characters which are phylogenetically useful at higher taxonomic levels (including aperture type, pollen wall architecture, pollen-unit, polarity, symmetry, shape, and grain size), and their evolutionary trends are examined.Many palynological characters and concepts are subjected to re-examination, particularly in an evolutionaryphylogenetic context.An attempt is made to show how pollen characters correlate with various higher categories of the Takhtajan and Cronquist systems of angiosperm classification and to outline certain phylogenetic trends observed in the pollen of different groups of angiosperms.With some exceptions, pollen morphology is consistent with the levels of relative advancement and the relationships postulated in the Takhtajan and Cronquist systems.Angiosperm pollen grains are clearly divisible into two fundamentally different types (each with its own derivatives ) : heteropolar, bilateral, boat-shaped monosulcate pollen versus isopolar, radiosymmetric, globose tricolpate pollen."Gymnospermous" monosulcate pollen and derivative types (ulcerate, disulculate, etc.) characterize both the putatively primitive dicotyledonous subclass Magnoliidae and the monocotyledons.The six non-magnoliid dicotyledonous subclasses, on the other hand, are characterized by tricolpate pollen and derivative types (tricolporate, triporate, rugate, etc.).Relatively primitive tricolpate pollen is retained by many Ranunculidae, 1J.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fægri, K., & Iversen, J. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,822
Evolution and classification of flowering plants
(1979) · Brittonia · doi:10.1007/bf02806171 · Cited by 1,790
Tutin, W., Faegri, K., & Iversen, J. (1965) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2257999 · Cited by 566
Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms
Soltis, D. E., Bell, C. D., Kim, S., & Soltis, P. S. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1438.005 · Cited by 389
PALYNOLOGICAL EVIDENCE ON EARLY DIFFERENTIATION OF ANGIOSPERMS
MULLER, J. (1970) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01649.x · Cited by 267
Cretaceous angiosperm pollen of the Atlantic coastal plain and its evolutionary significance
Doyle, J. A. (1969) · Journal of the Arnold Arboretum · doi:10.5962/bhl.part.24686 · Cited by 252
Self-citationHow to know pollen and spores.
Kapp, R. O. (1969) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 227
Fossil Evidence on Early Evolution of the Monocotyledons
Doyle, J. A. (1973) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/407701 · Cited by 113
Self-citation
Cited by
Glossary of pollen and spore terminology
Punt, W., Hoen, P. P., Blackmore, S., Nilsson†, S., & Le Thomas, A. (2007) · Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology · doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.06.008 · Cited by 2,558
Constraints and Competition in the Evolution of Flowering Phenology
Kochmer, J. P., & Handel, S. N. (1986) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942549 · Cited by 329
Molecular and fossil evidence on the origin of angiosperms
Doyle, J. A. (2012) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105313 · Cited by 239
Self-citationDid insect pollination cause increased seed plant diversity?
GORELICK, R. (2001) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2001.tb01403.x · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, J. W., & Doyle, J. A.
- Venue
- Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1975
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 664
- ISSN
- 0026-6493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051714356
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 16.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Bases of Angiosperm Phylogeny: Palynology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2395271
- The paper
- Walker, J. W., & Doyle, J. A. (1975). The Bases of Angiosperm Phylogeny: Palynology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. https://doi.org/10.2307/2395271
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.