Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Estimation of the Number of Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in the City of Bristol, and Some Possible Factors Affecting Their Distribution

Harris, Stephen·1981·The Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

(1) In two areas of Bristol, one 5.5 km2, the other 3.2 kM2, fox litter counts in two consecutive years were used to estimate the number of fox family groups. There were 3.64 family groups/km2 in the larger area, 3.13/km2 in the smaller. In parts of the larger area densities of 4-5 family groups/km2 were recorded. (2) To obtain data on the distribution and relative densities of foxes throughout Bristol, nearly 88 000 school children were asked to record fox sightings for a period of one month. Since the absolute fox densities were known for two areas, the distribution of recorded sightings could then be used to estimate fox densities throughout the city. By this means it was calculated that there were 211 fox family groups in an area of 116 sq km, a mean density of 1.82 fox family groups/km2. (3) Fox distribution in the city was uneven, and fox density was not found to correlate with household density, housing type, age of housing stock, or any other obvious habitat feature. There was a negative correlation (P < 0.001) between the distribution of stray dogs and urban foxes. This was attributed to disturbance of the fox population by stray dogs. It is suggested that disturbance may be particularly important in the breeding season; dogs were the second major cause of mortality in young fox cubs. (4) Based on post-mortem material, it was calculated that the ratio of breeding to non-breeding vixens was 1:0.35, and so the adult fox population consisted of 211 males, 211 breeding females and 74 barren females. Assuming that all fox family groups breed each year, with a mean birth litter size of 4.80 (calculated from placental scars), the annual cub production would be 1013.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2402406

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Harris, S.
Venue
The Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1981-08
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
455
ISSN
0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2314126369
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Estimation of the Number of Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in the City of Bristol, and Some Possible Factors Affecting Their Distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2402406
The paper
Harris, S. (1981). An Estimation of the Number of Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in the City of Bristol, and Some Possible Factors Affecting Their Distribution. The Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2402406

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.