The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Estimation of the Number of Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in the City of Bristol, and Some Possible Factors Affecting Their Distribution
Abstract
(1) In two areas of Bristol, one 5.5 km2, the other 3.2 kM2, fox litter counts in two consecutive years were used to estimate the number of fox family groups. There were 3.64 family groups/km2 in the larger area, 3.13/km2 in the smaller. In parts of the larger area densities of 4-5 family groups/km2 were recorded. (2) To obtain data on the distribution and relative densities of foxes throughout Bristol, nearly 88 000 school children were asked to record fox sightings for a period of one month. Since the absolute fox densities were known for two areas, the distribution of recorded sightings could then be used to estimate fox densities throughout the city. By this means it was calculated that there were 211 fox family groups in an area of 116 sq km, a mean density of 1.82 fox family groups/km2. (3) Fox distribution in the city was uneven, and fox density was not found to correlate with household density, housing type, age of housing stock, or any other obvious habitat feature. There was a negative correlation (P < 0.001) between the distribution of stray dogs and urban foxes. This was attributed to disturbance of the fox population by stray dogs. It is suggested that disturbance may be particularly important in the breeding season; dogs were the second major cause of mortality in young fox cubs. (4) Based on post-mortem material, it was calculated that the ratio of breeding to non-breeding vixens was 1:0.35, and so the adult fox population consisted of 211 males, 211 breeding females and 74 barren females. Assuming that all fox family groups breed each year, with a mean birth litter size of 4.80 (calculated from placental scars), the annual cub production would be 1013.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Big City Life: Carnivores in Urban Environments
Bateman, P. W., & Fleming, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00887.x · Cited by 832
Contesse, P., Hegglin, D., Gloor, S., Bontadina, F., & Deplazes, P. (2004) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1078/1616-5047-00123 · Cited by 337
Impact of predation by domestic cats Felis catus in an urban area
BAKER, P. J., BENTLEY, A. J., ANSELL, R. J., & HARRIS, S. (2005) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00071.x · Cited by 254
Self-citationThe history of farm foxes undermines the animal domestication syndrome
Lord, K. A., Larson, G., Coppinger, R. P., & Karlsson, E. K. (2020) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.011 · Cited by 194
The city-fox phenomenon: genetic consequences of a recent colonization of urban habitat
Wandeler, P., Funk, S. M., Largiadèr, C. R., Gloor, S., & Breitenmoser, U. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01768.x · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 455
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2314126369
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Estimation of the Number of Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in the City of Bristol, and Some Possible Factors Affecting Their Distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2402406
- The paper
- Harris, S. (1981). An Estimation of the Number of Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in the City of Bristol, and Some Possible Factors Affecting Their Distribution. The Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2402406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.