The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Reconstruction of Ecosystems: Presidential Address to the British Ecological Society, December 1982
Abstract
With the planted forest ecosystems of Cercidiphyllum japonicum, Betula utilis, Pinus yunnansinsis, and Picea asperata in subalpine area of west Sichuan as test objects, their total biomass and the C and N contents in soils and tree organs were determined. The results showed that the allocation of C in tree organs had less correlation with the age of the organs, while that of N and C/N ratio had closer relationship with the age. The N content in young organs was higher than that in aged ones, whereas the C/N ratio was higher in aged organs than in young organs, and higher in the leaf litters of needle-leaved forests than in those of broad-leaved forests. There was an obvious enrichment of C and N in the topsoil of test forests. The accumulated amounts of C and N in the whole planted forest ecosystem, including tree, litter, and 0-40 cm soil layer, were 176.75-228.05 t x hm(-2) and 11.06-16.54 t x hm(-2), respectively, and the nutrients allocation ratio between soil-litter and tree was (1.9-3.3):1 for C and (15.6-41.5):1 for N. Needle-leaved forests functioned as a stronger "C-sink" than broad-leaved forests. The decomposition rate of the leaf litters in needle-leaved forests was larger than that in broad-leaved forests, with the turnover rate being 2.2-3.7 years and 3.9-4.2 years, respectively. During the decomposition of leaf litter, the C in all of the four forests released at super-speed, with the turnover rate being 1.9-3.4 years. As for N, it also released at super-speed in C. japonicum and B. utilis forests, with the turnover rate being 1.9-3.2 years, but released at low speed in P. yunnansinsis and P. asperata forests, with the turnover rate being 6.7-8.5 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Restoration of mined lands - using natural processes
Bradshaw, A. (1997) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0925-8574(97)00022-0 · Cited by 713
Self-citationCooke, J. A., & Johnson, M. S. (2002) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a01-014 · Cited by 367
The use of natural processes in reclamation - advantages and difficulties
Bradshaw, A. (2000) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(00)00099-2 · Cited by 352
Self-citationEcosystem carbon budgeting and soil carbon sequestration in reclaimed mine soil
Shrestha, R. K., & Lal, R. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.001 · Cited by 228
Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation
Frouz, J., Pižl, V., Cienciala, E., & Kalčík, J. (2009) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradshaw, A. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2408840022
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Reconstruction of Ecosystems: Presidential Address to the British Ecological Society, December 1982. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2403372
- The paper
- Bradshaw, A. D. (1983). The Reconstruction of Ecosystems: Presidential Address to the British Ecological Society, December 1982. The Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2403372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.