The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RESISTANCE AND RESILIENCE OF ALPINE LAKE FAUNA TO FISH INTRODUCTIONS
Knapp, R. A., Matthews, K. R., & Sarnelle, O. (2001) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0401:raroal]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 367
Amphibian and reptile declines over 35 years at La Selva, Costa Rica
Whitfield, S. M., Bell, K. E., Philippi, T., Sasa, M., Bolaños, F., Chaves, G., Savage, J. M., & Donnelly, M. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611256104 · Cited by 355
Self-citationLinking a cougar decline, trophic cascade, and catastrophic regime shift in Zion National Park
Ripple, W. J., & Beschta, R. L. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.07.002 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Parmelee, J. R., Heyer, W. R., Donnelly, M. A., McDiarmid, R. W., Hayek, L.-A. C., & Foster, M. S.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 272
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2570649685
- Cited by
- 1,279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2413714
- The paper
- Parmelee, J. R., Heyer, W. R., Donnelly, M. A., McDiarmid, R. W., Hayek, L.-A. C., & Foster, M. S. (1995). Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2413714
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
