The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Association
Abstract
The units of vegetation, which form the subject of our discussions this week, were just as easily visible to primitive man as they are to us today. They were equally visible to the sages of Greece and Rome two thousand years ago, to our European ancestors a thousand years ago. Through all these long years they were neglected by scientists, whose thoughts were turned in different directions, but they were recognized by -the laity. As a result the languages of Europe all contain a number of terms which refer, usually rather loosely, to vegetation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Holocene Vegetation Patterns in the Adirondack Mountains
Jackson, S. T., & Whitehead, D. R. (1991) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2937204 · Cited by 90
The Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Debate in Ecology
deLaplante, K., & Picasso, V. (2011) · Philosophy of Ecology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51673-2.50007-8 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Gleason, H. A.
- Venue
- American Midland Naturalist
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1939-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92
- ISSN
- 0003-0031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2335256095
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
