Cited by 326Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Parasitism and ResistancePlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies

Concepts and terminology of apical dominance

Cline, Morris G.·1997·American Journal of Botany

Abstract

Apical dominance is the control exerted by the shoot apex over lateral bud outgrowth. The concepts and terminology associated with apical dominance as used by various plant scientists sometimes differ, which may lead to significant misconceptions. Apical dominance and its release may be divided into four developmental stages: (I) lateral bud formation, (II) imposition of inhibition on lateral bud growth, (III) release of apical dominance following decapitation, and (IV) branch shoot development. Particular emphasis is given to discriminating between Stage III, which is accompanied by initial bud outgrowth during the first few hours of release and may be promoted by cytokinin and inhibited by auxin, and Stage IV, which is accompanied by subsequent bud outgrowth occurring days or weeks after decapitation and which may be promoted by auxin and gibberellin. The importance of not interpreting data measured in Stage IV on the basis of conditions and processes occurring in Stage III is discussed as well as the correlation between degree of branching and endogenous auxin content, branching mutants, the quantification of apical dominance in various species (including Arabidopsis ), and apical control in trees.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2446149

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Axillary branching is normally suppressed or at least reduced by the shoot apex through a regulatory system termed apical dominance.

    “Axillary branching is normally suppressed or at least reduced by the shoot apex through a regulatory system that has been termed apical dominance (reviewed in Cline, 1997; Leyser, 2005).”

    From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Cline, 1997

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 31 · Cited by 326

Authors
Cline, M. G.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cline, Morris G.
Venue
American Journal of Botany
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-08
Volume
84
Issue
8
Pages
1064-1069
ISSN
  • 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2197
OpenAlex
W2119895133
Cited by
326
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Botany (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Keywords
apical dominance, shoot apex, decapitation, cytokinins, auxin, gibberellin, endogenous auxin, Arabidopsis, trees, terminology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review