The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information Systems For Competitive Advantage: Implementation of a Planning Process
Abstract
As the pace of competition intensifies in the 80’s, the use of information systems as competitive weapons is accelerating. Among the now classic cases are the computerized reservation system of American Airlines, the Cash Management Account of Merrill Lynch, and the order entry system of American Hospital Supply. These are examples of strategic information systems (SIS). The work that gave rise to this paper addresses the question, “How can an organization discover such SIS opportunities systematically?’’ The authors developed and implemented a five-phase planning process to identify and evaluate SIS and to win top management support. Underlying their approach is a conceptual framework that views an enterprise’s suppliers, customers, and competitors as the strategic targets of five strategic thrusts: differentiation, cost, innovation, growth, and alliance. Strategic thrusts represent the fundamental link between the firm’s strategy and its use of information technology. Strategic information systems support and shape the organization’s strategic thrusts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Cited by
The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations
Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2003) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000446 · Cited by 919
The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model
Sabherwal, R., Hirschheim, R., & Goles, T. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.2.179.10113 · Cited by 503
(2000) · Cited by 403
A Glorious and Not-So-Short History of the Information Systems Field
Louisiana State University, Hirschheim, R., Klein, H., & State University of New York (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00294 · Cited by 282
Cybersecurity Hazards and Financial System Vulnerability: A Synthesis of Literature
Uddin, M. H., Ali, M. H., & Hassan, M. K. (2020) · Risk Management · doi:10.1057/s41283-020-00063-2 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Rackoff, N., Wiseman, C., & Ullrich, W. A.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1985-12-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 285-294
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2105570195
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information Systems For Competitive Advantage: Implementation of a Planning Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/249229
- The paper
- Rackoff, N., Wiseman, C., & Ullrich, W. A. (1985). Information Systems For Competitive Advantage: Implementation of a Planning Process. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.