The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe.
Abstract
Since its initial publication in 1973, Hayden White's Metahistory has remained an essential book for understanding the nature of historical writing. In this classic work, White argues that a deep structural content lies beyond the surface level of historical texts. This latent poetic and linguistic content - which White dubs the metahistorical element - essentially serves as a paradigm for what an appropriate historical explanation should be. To support his thesis, White analyzes the complex writing styles of historians like Michelet, Ranke, Tocqueville, and Burckhardt, and philosophers of history such as Marx, Hegel, Nietzsche, and Croce. The first work in the history of historiography to concentrate on historical writing as writing, Metahistory sets out to deprive history of its status as a bedrock of factual truth, to redeem narrative as the substance of historicality, and to identify the extent to which any distinction between history and ideology on the basis of the presumed scientificity of the former is spurious. This fortieth-anniversary edition includes a new preface in which White explains his motivation for writing Metahistory and discusses how reactions to the book informed his later writing. In a new foreword, Michael S. Roth, a former student of White's and the current president of Wesleyan University, reflects on the significance of the book across a broad range of fields, including history, literary theory, and philosophy. This book will be of interest to anyone-in any discipline-who takes the past as a serious object of study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/0951839950080103 · Cited by 3,958
Postcolonial Studies and the Challenge of Climate Change
Chakrabarty, D. (2012) · New Literary History · doi:10.1353/nlh.2012.0007 · Cited by 656
Narrativity, Narrative Identity, and Social Action: Rethinking English Working-Class Formation
Somers, M. R. (1992) · Social Science History · doi:10.1017/s0145553200016679 · Cited by 398
The mind and its stories: narrative universals and human emotion
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4471 · Cited by 297
The Science of Qualitative Research
Packer, M. J. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264907 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, J. S., & White, H. V.
- Venue
- History and Theory
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1975-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74
- ISSN
- 0018-2656 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101949838
- Cited by
- 2,647
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 120.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2504605
- The paper
- Nelson, J. S., & White, H. V. (1975). Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. History and Theory. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.