The Passion of Sacco and Vanzetti: A Global History
Abstract
On May 1, 1927, in the port city of Tampico, Mexico, a thousand workers gathered at the American consulate. Blocking the street in front of the building, they listened as local union officials and radicals took turns stepping onto a tin garbage can to shout fiery speeches. Their denunciations of American imperialism, the power of Wall Street, and the injustices of capital drew cheers from the gathered crowd. But it was their remarks about the fate of two Italian anarchists in the United States, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, that aroused the “greatest enthusiasm,” in the words of an American consular officials who observed the event. The speakers called Sacco and Vanzetti their “compatriots” and “their brothers.” They urged American officials to heed the voice of “labor the world over” and release the men from their death sentences.1 Between 1921 and 1927, as Sacco and Vanzetti's trial and appeals progressed, scenes like the one in Tampico were replayed again and again throughout Latin America and Europe. Over those six years, the Sacco and Vanzetti case developed from a local robbery and murder trial into a global event. Building on earlier networks, solidarities, and identities and impelled forward by a short-lived but powerful sense of transnational worker solidarity, the movement in the men's favor crystallized in a unique moment of international collective mobilization. Although the world would never again witness an international, worker-led protest of comparable…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Federal law enforcement agencies targeted so-called subversives and radicals during the Red Scare of the 1920s.
“Federal law enforcement agencies targeted so-called subversives and radicals during the Red Scare of the 1920s (McGirr 2007; Hernández 2022; see also Donner 1992 for the most comprehensive account).”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as McGirr 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States
Felker-Kantor, M. (2024) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/732194 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- McGirr, L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McGirr, L.
- ORCID
- McGirr, L.
- Venue
- Journal of American History
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1085-1115
- ISSN
- 0021-8723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020109799
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of American History (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Anarchism and Radical Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Communism, Protests, Social Movements
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
- Keywords
- Nicola Sacco, Bartolomeo Vanzetti, anarchist trials, transnational solidarity, labor movement, international protest, political prisoners, death sentence, American imperialism, Latin American labor movement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review