The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Editor’s Comments
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“monitoring organizational electronic communication during nonwork hours can be considered a fundamental trigger of resource allocation dilemma between work and nonwork domains.”
From Killing Me Softly: Organizational E-mail Monitoring Expectations’ Impact on Employee and Significant Other Well-Being (2021) · cites this paper as Weber, 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Becker, W. J., Belkin, L. Y., Conroy, S. A., & Tuskey, S. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319890655 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, R.
- Corresponding author
- Weber, Ron
- ORCID
- Weber, Ron
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- iii-xiv
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2802746375
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Editor’s Comments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/25148641
- The paper
- Weber, R. (2004). Editor’s Comments. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148641
