The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Price Uncertainty, Utility, and Industry Equilibrium in Pure Competition
Abstract
THE NEOCLASSICAL THEORY of the firm assumes that the entrepreneur behaves as if his demand curve, production function, and factor costs are known with certainty. Although it is recognized that the firm may be uncertain about the form of these functions, the entrepreneur is assumed to compress his judgments about a function into a best estimate. He then behaves as if the best estimate represents the function with certainty. The formal consideration of uncertainty about the functions, however, can significantly qualify the results of neoclassical theory. The purpose of this article is to extend the traditional deterministic model of the firm to the situation in which the price for the firm's product is a random variable. The analysis of this situation is important not only 1Qecause of the generalization of the traditional model, but because it introduces additional considerations, such as attitudes toward risk, that may help to litter explain observed behavior. A number of authors 'have investigated various aspects of the static theory of the firm under demand uncertainty and their major results will be briefly discussed here. Their models can be differentiated by the competitiveness of the economic environment assumed, the nature of the demand uncertainty, and by the behavioral assumptions employed. The models of purely competitive firms will be discussed first and then models of firms in imperfect competition will be considered. Uncertainty is usually introduced into a model of pure competition by assuming that price is uncertain and that the firm can sell any quantity at the price that obtains in the market. Oi [15] assumed that the firm was able to observe price prior to determining output or equivalently that the firm could instantaneously adjust output. With this assumption and an objective of maximizing( expected profit the firm produces such that price and marginal cost are equated as in deterministic theory. Oi was concerned with the desirability of price uncertainty and demonstrated that expected profit exceeds the profit that would be obtained with a certain price which is equal to the expected price. He also demonstrated that the firm prefers increased variability of price in certain cases and extended the analysis to the case of a firm with nonlinear risk preferences.2 Nelson [13] presumed that the firm makes its output decision prior to ob
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smallholder Participation in Contract Farming: Comparative Evidence from Five Countries
Barrett, C. B., Bachke, M. E., Bellemare, M. F., Michelson, H. C., Narayanan, S., & Walker, T. F. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.006 · Cited by 730
Rising food prices, food price volatility, and social unrest
Bellemare, M. F. (2015) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aau038 · Cited by 636
A two-armed bandit theory of market pricing
Rothschild, M. (1974) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(74)90066-0 · Cited by 618
Models of Market Organization with Imperfect Information: A Survey
Rothschild, M. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260128 · Cited by 431
(1982) · American Economic Review · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Baron, D. P.
- Venue
- International Economic Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1970-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 463
- ISSN
- 0020-6598 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072794866
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Price Uncertainty, Utility, and Industry Equilibrium in Pure Competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2525325
- The paper
- Baron, D. P. (1970). Price Uncertainty, Utility, and Industry Equilibrium in Pure Competition. International Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.