The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equations Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables
Abstract
A large number of studies have been made on the impact of labor unions on wage rates of workers. These studies generally have found positive and significant effects of unionism on wage rates. More recently, a few authors have studied the simultaneous effects between unionism and wages. Ashenfelter and Johnson [1972] used aggregated U.S. Manufacturing Industries Data and found that unionism had no significant impact on wage rates, but that the wage rate had a significant effect on the extent of unionism. Since the data they used were quite limited, they could only conclude that the magnitude of the effects of unionism on wage rates was uncertain. Schmidt and Strauss [1976] reached similar conclusions using macroeconomic data. Their mixed logit approach, however, is not based on choice behavior and does not fit into a traditional econometric framework. This study extends recent investigations of the joint determination of the extent of unionism and the effects of unions on wage rates, using macroeconomic data from the Survey of Economic Opportunity Sample of 1967. Economic considerations suggest that the propensity to join a union depends on the net wage gains that might result from trade union membership. The explicit inclusion of this interdependence between the wage gain equation and the union membership equation in the model represents our point of departure from the previous work of Ashenfelter and Johnson and Schmidt and Strauss. The model is a variant of a traditional simultaneous equations model with a binary qualitative variable (union membership) and limited dependent variables. In Section 2, the conceptual framework of the model is discussed. Properties of the data are presented in Section 3. Section 4 briefly discusses estimation methods, and empirical estimates are presented in Section 5. Finally, in Section 6, conclusions are drawn.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research
Hamilton, B. H., & Nickerson, J. A. (2003) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127003001001218 · Cited by 1,309
Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research
Bascle, G. (2008) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127008094339 · Cited by 1,133
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Endogenous Switching Regression Models
Lokshin, M., & Sajaia, Z. (2004) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0400400306 · Cited by 964
The Effect of Unions on the Structure of Wages: A Longitudinal Analysis
Card, D. (1996) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2171852 · Cited by 692
Relative deprivation and international migration oded stark
Stark, O., & Taylor, J. E. (1989) · Demography · doi:10.2307/2061490 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, L.-F.
- Venue
- International Economic Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1978-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 415
- ISSN
- 0020-6598 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090539283
- Cited by
- 1,173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equations Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2526310
- The paper
- Lee, L.-F. (1978). Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equations Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables. International Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.