The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk, Schooling and the Choice of Seed Technology in Developing Countries: A Meta-Profit Function Approach
Abstract
Mark M. Pitt, Gunawan Sumodiningrat, Risk, Schooling and the Choice of Seed Technology in Developing Countries: A Meta-Profit Function Approach, International Economic Review, Vol. 32, No. 2 (May, 1991), pp. 457-473
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The argument that farmers who are credit constrained find it difficult to adopt new agricultural technologies is well documented in the literature (Bhalla, 1979; Pitt and Sumodiningrat, 1991; Lipton, 1976).”
From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Pitt and Sumodiningrat, 1991
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India
Bharadwaj, P., & Ali Mirza, R. (2019) · Explorations in Economic History · doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2019.05.001 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Pitt, M. M., & Sumodiningrat, G.
- Venue
- International Economic Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 457
- ISSN
- 0020-6598 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982629195
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural risk and resilience
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Keywords
- agricultural risk, school education, agricultural technology adoption, developing countries, risk aversion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
