The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Estimation of Environmental and Genetic Trends from Records Subject to Culling
Abstract
A very common problem which arises in animal or plant breeding research is that of assessinig the gain which has resulted from a selection program carr'ied oIn ovei a number of years. To be specific, let us suppose that we have a closed dairy herd which has been maintained over a number of years with selection being practiced. The records available for assessing any genetic improvemient consist of production records of cows in the various years and can be represented by a twoway classification, cow by year. At first it might be thought that such a two-way classification could be analyzed by the method of fitting constants [Yates, 1934]. Applications of this technique have, however, led to the apparent conclusion that the environment gradually deteriorated over the period of years, as indicated by the fact that the constants fitted for years tend to decrease year by year. Heinderson [1949] pointed out that a least squares procedure in which the cow effects are regarded as fixed leads to biased estimates. Lush and Shrode [19501 gave a simple explanation of the biases arising in the estimation of age correction factors; similar considerations apply to the estimation of year effects. The present paper is the combined
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Analysis of Multiple Classifications with Unequal Numbers in the Different Classes
Yates, F. (1934) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1934.10502686 · Cited by 374
Changes in Milk Production with Age and Milking Frequency
Lush, J. L., & Shrode, R. R. (1950) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(50)91909-6 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Improved Heritability Estimation from Genome-wide SNPs
Speed, D., Hemani, G., Johnson, M. R., & Balding, D. J. (2012) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.010 · Cited by 720
SMITH, A. B., CULLIS, B. R., & THOMPSON, R. (2005) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859605005587 · Cited by 623
Yu, Z., Guindani, M., Grieco, S. F., Chen, L., Holmes, T. C., & Xu, X. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.030 · Cited by 563
Relatedness in the post-genomic era: is it still useful?
Speed, D., & Balding, D. J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3821 · Cited by 316
Are cattle, sheep, and goats endangered species?
TABERLET, P., VALENTINI, A., REZAEI, H. R., NADERI, S., POMPANON, F., NEGRINI, R., & AJMONE‐MARSAN, P. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03475.x · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, C. R., Kempthorne, O., Searle, S. R., & von Krosigk, C. M.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1959-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2325014228
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Estimation of Environmental and Genetic Trends from Records Subject to Culling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2527669
- The paper
- Henderson, C. R., Kempthorne, O., Searle, S. R., & von Krosigk, C. M. (1959). The Estimation of Environmental and Genetic Trends from Records Subject to Culling. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.