The DOI matches its Crossref record.
General Right Censoring and Its Impact on the Analysis of Survival Data
Abstract
This paper concerns general right censoring and some of the difficulties it creates in the analysis of survival data. A general formulation of censored-survival processes leads to the partition of all models into those based on noninformative and informative censoring. Nearly all statistical methods for censored data assume that censoring is noninformative. Topics considered within this class include: the relationships between three models for noninformative censoring, the use of likelihood methods for inferences about the distribution of survival time, the effects of censoring on the K-sample problem, and the effects of censoring on model testing. Also considered are several topics which relate to informative censoring models. These include: problems of nonidentifiability that can be encountered when attempting to assess a set of data for the type of censoring in effect, the consequences of falsely assuming that censoring is noninformative, and classes of informative censoring models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Misinformation in and about science
West, J. D., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1912444117 · Cited by 391
CENSORING ISSUES IN SURVIVAL ANALYSIS
Leung, K.-M., Elashoff, R. M., & Afifi, A. A. (1997) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.83 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Lagakos, S. W.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1979-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039944302
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: General Right Censoring and Its Impact on the Analysis of Survival Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2529941
- The paper
- Lagakos, S. W. (1979). General Right Censoring and Its Impact on the Analysis of Survival Data. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.