Cited by 516Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic diversity and population structureGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Inferences about Linkage Disequilibrium

Weir, B. S.·1979·Biometrics

Abstract

Existing theory for inferences about linkage disequilibrium is restricted to a measure defined on gametic frequencies. Unless gametic frequencies are directly observable, they are inferred from genotypic frequencies under the assumption of random union of gametes. Primary emphasis in this paper is given to genotypic data, and disequilibrium coefficients are defined for all subsets of two or more of the four genes, two at each of two loci, carried by an individual. Linkage disequilibrium coefficients are defined for genes within and between gametes, and methods of estimating and testing these coefficients are given for gametic data. For genotypic data, when coupling and repulsion double heterozygotes cannot be distinguished. Burrows' composite measure of linkage disequilibrium is discussed. In particular, the estimate for this measure and hypothesis tests based on it are compared to the usual maximum likelihood estimate of gametic linkage disequilibrium, and corresponding likelihood ratio or contingency chi-square tests. General use of the composite measure, whether or not random union of gametes is an appropriate assumption, is recommended. Attention is given to small samples, where the non-normality of gene frequencies will have greatest effect on methods of inference based on normal theory. Even tools such as Fisher's z-transformation for the correlation of gene frequencies are found to perform quite satisfactorily.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2529947

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of information about haplotype phase weakens the signal of nonrandom association sufficiently that quantifying LD in genotypic data is not often taken.

    “The extent of LD in genotypic data2,9 can be quantified, but the lack of information about the haplotype phase weakens the signal of nonrandom association sufficiently that this approach is not often taken.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weir, B. S.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Weir, B. S.
Venue
Biometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1979-03
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
235
ISSN
0006-341X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001583270
Cited by
516
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 26
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biometrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
linkage disequilibrium, genotype frequency, double heterozygotes, maximum likelihood estimation, hypothesis testing, small sample inference, Fisher's z-transformation, allele frequency, likelihood ratio test
MeSH terms
Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review