The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of Covariance and Standardization as Instances of Prediction
Abstract
In this paper, prediction provides the basis for unifying the procedures of covariances adjustment and standardization. Analysis of covariance is a method of forming predictions from a linear model; it is used when qualitative effects are to be studied and the effects of continuous variables are to be adjusted for. An essential feature is the division into effects of interest and effects for which adjustment is required. Covariates may also be qualitative: as such, they are used implicitly in experimental designs with blocks, where treatment effects are adjusted for the effect of blocks. The technique of standardization is well-known in epidemiology and demography as a method of adjusting explicitly for qualitative effects. The same division of effects applies when an analysis that uses generalized linear models is summarized. Two distinct types of prediction, which give identical results in classical linear models, are available: prediction may be conditional on a fixed value of a covariate, or marginal on a distribution of values such as the distribution in the set of data being analysed. Prediction methods are illustrated by the analysis of a table of proportions by use of a logit model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Major congenital malformations after first-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitors
Cooper, W. O., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Arbogast, P. G., Dudley, J. A., Dyer, S., Gideon, P. S., Hall, K., & Ray, W. A. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055202 · Cited by 1,192
Frequency of Bowel Movements and the Future Risk of Parkinson’s Disease
Abbott, R. D., Petrovitch, H., White, L. R., Masaki, K. H., Tanner, C. M., Curb, J. D., Grandinetti, A., Blanchette, P. L., Popper, J. S., & Ross, G. W. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.57.3.456 · Cited by 839
Association of coffee and caffeine intake with the risk of Parkinson disease
Ross, G. W. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.20.2674 · Cited by 778
Muller, C. J., & MacLehose, R. F. (2014) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyu029 · Cited by 775
Walking and Dementia in Physically Capable Elderly Men
Abbott, R. D. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.12.1447 · Cited by 743
Metadata
- Authors
- Lane, P. W., & Nelder, J. A.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 613
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2327954903
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Covariance and Standardization as Instances of Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2530043
- The paper
- Lane, P. W., & Nelder, J. A. (1982). Analysis of Covariance and Standardization as Instances of Prediction. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2530043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.