Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analysis of Covariance and Standardization as Instances of Prediction

Lane, Peter W., Nelder, John A.·1982·Biometrics

Abstract

In this paper, prediction provides the basis for unifying the procedures of covariances adjustment and standardization. Analysis of covariance is a method of forming predictions from a linear model; it is used when qualitative effects are to be studied and the effects of continuous variables are to be adjusted for. An essential feature is the division into effects of interest and effects for which adjustment is required. Covariates may also be qualitative: as such, they are used implicitly in experimental designs with blocks, where treatment effects are adjusted for the effect of blocks. The technique of standardization is well-known in epidemiology and demography as a method of adjusting explicitly for qualitative effects. The same division of effects applies when an analysis that uses generalized linear models is summarized. Two distinct types of prediction, which give identical results in classical linear models, are available: prediction may be conditional on a fixed value of a covariate, or marginal on a distribution of values such as the distribution in the set of data being analysed. Prediction methods are illustrated by the analysis of a table of proportions by use of a logit model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2530043

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Lane, P. W., & Nelder, J. A.
Venue
Biometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1982-09
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
613
ISSN
0006-341X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2327954903
Cited by
311
References
0
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Covariance and Standardization as Instances of Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2530043
The paper
Lane, P. W., & Nelder, J. A. (1982). Analysis of Covariance and Standardization as Instances of Prediction. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2530043

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.