The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Probabilities of Non-Positive Definite between-Group or Genetic Covariance Matrices
Abstract
The probability (Q) that the estimated between-group covariance matrix is not positive deJinite is computed for the balanced single classlfication multivariate analysis of variance with random effects. It is shown that Q depends only on the roots of the matrix product of the inverse of the true within-group and the true between-group covariance matrices which, for independent variables, reduces to expressions in intra-class correlations. Values of Q are computedfor ranges of size of experiment, intra-class correlation and number of variables. Even for large experiments, Q can approach 100% if there are many variables, for example with 160 groups of size 10 and either 8 independent variables each with intra-class 0.025 or 14 variables each with intra-class correlation 0.0625. Some rationalization of the results is given in terms of the bias in the roots of the sample between-group covariance matrix. In genetic applications, the between-group covariance matrix is proportional to the genetic covariance matrix, if non-positive definite, heritabilities and ordinary or partial genetic correlations are outside their valid limits, and the effiect on selection index construction is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ontogenetic integration of the hominoid face
ACKERMANN, R. (2005) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.11.001 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill, W. G., & Thompson, R.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1978-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 429
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2332468989
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilities of Non-Positive Definite between-Group or Genetic Covariance Matrices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2530605
- The paper
- Hill, W. G., & Thompson, R. (1978). Probabilities of Non-Positive Definite between-Group or Genetic Covariance Matrices. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2530605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.