Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Probabilities of Non-Positive Definite between-Group or Genetic Covariance Matrices

Hill, W. G., Thompson, R.·1978·Biometrics

Abstract

The probability (Q) that the estimated between-group covariance matrix is not positive deJinite is computed for the balanced single classlfication multivariate analysis of variance with random effects. It is shown that Q depends only on the roots of the matrix product of the inverse of the true within-group and the true between-group covariance matrices which, for independent variables, reduces to expressions in intra-class correlations. Values of Q are computedfor ranges of size of experiment, intra-class correlation and number of variables. Even for large experiments, Q can approach 100% if there are many variables, for example with 160 groups of size 10 and either 8 independent variables each with intra-class 0.025 or 14 variables each with intra-class correlation 0.0625. Some rationalization of the results is given in terms of the bias in the roots of the sample between-group covariance matrix. In genetic applications, the between-group covariance matrix is proportional to the genetic covariance matrix, if non-positive definite, heritabilities and ordinary or partial genetic correlations are outside their valid limits, and the effiect on selection index construction is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2530605

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Hill, W. G., & Thompson, R.
Venue
Biometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1978-09
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
429
ISSN
0006-341X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2332468989
Cited by
211
References
0
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilities of Non-Positive Definite between-Group or Genetic Covariance Matrices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2530605
The paper
Hill, W. G., & Thompson, R. (1978). Probabilities of Non-Positive Definite between-Group or Genetic Covariance Matrices. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2530605

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.