Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Risk Classification and Sex Discrimination in Pension Plans

McCarthy, David D., Turner, John A.·1993·The Journal of Risk and Insurance

Abstract

Two Supreme Court decisions concerning the legal definition of discrimination in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibit as discriminatory the use of separate mortality tables for men and women in pension benefit calculations. We analyze discriminatory aspects of risk classification and find that the Civil Rights Act has increased discrimination in pension compensation. This article demonstrates both theoretically and by simulation that sex-based risk classification results in less sex discrimination and less individual discrimination than a unisex approach. This result holds for various sex-based classification policies, as well as for various definitions of discrimination and statistics used to quantify those definitions. Of six pension classification policies, the Supreme Court's policy of unisex classification is the most discriminatory.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/253100

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
McCarthy, D. D., & Turner, J. A.
Venue
The Journal of Risk and Insurance
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1993-03
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
85
ISSN
0022-4367
Cited by
11
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Classification and Sex Discrimination in Pension Plans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/253100
The paper
McCarthy, D. D., & Turner, J. A. (1993). Risk Classification and Sex Discrimination in Pension Plans. The Journal of Risk and Insurance. https://doi.org/10.2307/253100