The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimates of Absolute Cause-Specific Risk in Cohort Studies
Abstract
In this paper we study methods for estimating the absolute risk of an event c1 in a time interval [t1, t2], given that the individual is at risk at t1 and given the presence of competing risks. We discuss some advantages of absolute risk for measuring the prognosis of an individual patient and some difficulties of interpretation for comparing two treatment groups. We also discuss the importance of the concept of absolute risk in evaluating public health measures to prevent disease. Variance calculations permit one to gauge the relative importance of random and systematic errors in estimating absolute risk. Efficiency calculations were also performed to determine how much precision is lost in estimating absolute risk with a nonparametric approach or with a flexible piecewise exponential model rather than a simple exponential model, and other calculations indicate the extent of bias that arises with the simple exponential model when that model is invalid. Such calculations suggest that the more flexible models will be useful in practice. Simulations confirm that asymptotic methods yield reliable variance estimates and confidence interval coverages in samples of practical size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study
Andersen, P. K., & Gill, R. D. (1982) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176345976 · Cited by 4,419
Cited by
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
Gooley, T. A., Leisenring, W., Crowley, J., & Storer, B. E. (1999) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990330)18:6<695::aid-sim60>3.0.co;2-o · Cited by 2,688
Pepe, M. S., & Mori, M. (1993) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780120803 · Cited by 620
Choice and Interpretation of Statistical Tests Used When Competing Risks Are Present
Dignam, J. J., & Kocherginsky, M. N. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.12.9866 · Cited by 268
Benzodiazepines and Injurious Falls in Community Dwelling Elders
Pariente, A., Dartigues, J.-F., Benichou, J., Letenneur, L., Moore, N., & Fourrier-Réglat, A. (2008) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.2165/00002512-200825010-00007 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Benichou, J., & Gail, M. H.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 813
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976343642
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimates of Absolute Cause-Specific Risk in Cohort Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2532098
- The paper
- Benichou, J., & Gail, M. H. (1990). Estimates of Absolute Cause-Specific Risk in Cohort Studies. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.