The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Joint Model for Survival and Longitudinal Data Measured with Error
Abstract
The relationship between a longitudinal covariate and a failure time process can be assessed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. We consider the problem of estimating the parameters in the Cox model when the longitudinal covariate is measured infrequently and with measurement error. We assume a repeated measures random effects model for the covariate process. Estimates of the parameters are obtained by maximizing the joint likelihood for the covariate process and the failure time process. This approach uses the available information optimally because we use both the covariate and survival data simultaneously. Parameters are estimated using the expectation-maximization algorithm. We argue that such a method is superior to naive methods where one maximizes the partial likelihood of the Cox model using the observed covariate values. It also improves on two-stage methods where, in the first stage, empirical Bayes estimates of the covariate process are computed and then used as time-dependent covariates in a second stage to find the parameters in the Cox model that maximize the partial likelihood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
Cited by
Handling drop‐out in longitudinal studies
Hogan, J. W., Roy, J., & Korkontzelou, C. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1728 · Cited by 404
Jiang, G., Luk, A. O. Y., Tam, C. H. T., Xie, F., Carstensen, B., Lau, E. S. H., Lim, C. K. P., Lee, H. M., Ng, A. C. W., Ng, M. C. Y., et al. (2019) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.026 · Cited by 159
Prediction of Conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease with Longitudinal Measures and Time-To-Event Data
Li, K., Chan, W., Doody, R. S., Quinn, J., Luo, S., & Initiative, T. A. D. N. (2017) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-161201 · Cited by 126
Stochastic model for analysis of longitudinal data on aging and mortality
Yashin, A. I., Arbeev, K. G., Akushevich, I., Kulminski, A., Akushevich, L., & Ukraintseva, S. V. (2007) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2006.11.006 · Cited by 82
Measuring Cognitive Function With Age: The Influence of Selection by Health and Survival
Euser, S. M., Schram, M. T., Hofman, A., Westendorp, R. G. J., & Breteler, M. M. B. (2008) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e31816a1d31 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Wulfsohn, M. S., & Tsiatis, A. A.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 330
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034945547
- Cited by
- 966
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Joint Model for Survival and Longitudinal Data Measured with Error. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2533118
- The paper
- Wulfsohn, M. S., & Tsiatis, A. A. (1997). A Joint Model for Survival and Longitudinal Data Measured with Error. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533118
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.