The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Class of Tests for Linkage Using Affected Pedigree Members
Abstract
We describe a class of nonparametric tests for linkage between a marker and a gene assumed to exist and to govern susceptibility to a disease. The tests are formed by assigning a score to each possible pattern of marker allele sharing (identity-by-descent) among affected pedigree members, and then averaging the scores over all patterns compatible with the observed marker genotype and genealogical relationship of the affected members. Different score functions give different tests. One function, which examines marker allele similarity across pairs of affected pedigree members, gives a test similar to that of Fimmers et al. (1989, in Multipoint Mapping and Linkage Based on Affected Pedigree Members: Genetic Analysis Workshop, R. C. Elston, M. A. Spence, S. E. Hodge, and J. W. MacCluer (eds), 123-128; City: Alan R. Liss). A second function examines allele similarity across arbitrary subsets, not just pairs, of affected members. The resulting test can be more powerful than the one based solely on pairs of affected members. The approach has several advantages: it does not require knowledge of the mode of disease inheritance; it does not require unambiguous determination of identity-by-descent at the marker; it does not suffer from variability due to chance allele similarity among affected members who are unrelated, such as spouses; it allows marker genotypes of unaffected members to contribute information on allele sharing among the affected; it permits calculation of exact P-values. Computational requirements limit the tests to many pedigrees with few (< 16) affected members.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genetic Dissection of Complex Traits
Lander, E. S., & Schork, N. J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8091226 · Cited by 3,413
A Common MUC5B Promoter Polymorphism and Pulmonary Fibrosis
Seibold, M. A., Wise, A. L., Speer, M. C., Steele, M. P., Brown, K. K., Loyd, J. E., Fingerlin, T. E., Zhang, W., Gudmundsson, G., Groshong, S. D., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1013660 · Cited by 1,198
Allegro, a new computer program for multipoint linkage analysis
Gudbjartsson, D. F., Jonasson, K., Frigge, M. L., & Kong, A. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75514 · Cited by 784
Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm
Vieland, V. J., & Hodge, S. E. (1998) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/499065 · Cited by 606
PEDSTATS: descriptive statistics, graphics and quality assessment for gene mapping data
Wigginton, J. E., & Abecasis, G. R. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti529 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Whittemore, A. S., & Halpern, J.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 118
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4300942465
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Class of Tests for Linkage Using Affected Pedigree Members. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2533202
- The paper
- Whittemore, A. S., & Halpern, J. (1994). A Class of Tests for Linkage Using Affected Pedigree Members. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.