The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance of Generalized Estimating Equations in Practical Situations
Abstract
Moment methods for analyzing repeated binary responses have been proposed by Liang and Zeger (1986, Biometrika 73, 13-22), and extended by Prentice (1988, Biometrics 44, 1033-1048). In their generalized estimating equations (GEE), both Liang and Zeger (1986) and Prentice (1988) estimate the parameters associated with the expected value of an individual's vector of binary responses as well as the correlations between pairs of binary responses. In this paper, we discuss one-step estimators, i.e., estimators obtained from one step of the generalized estimating equations, and compare their performance to that of the fully iterated estimators in small samples. In simulations, we find the performance of the one-step estimator to be qualitatively similar to that of the fully iterated estimator. When the sample size is small and the association between binary responses is high, we recommend using the one-step estimator to circumvent convergence problems associated with the fully iterated GEE algorithm. Furthermore, we find the GEE methods to be more efficient than ordinary logistic regression with variance correction for estimating the effect of a time-varying covariate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction?
Haas, J. S., Cook, E. F., Puopolo, A. L., Burstin, H. R., Cleary, P. D., & Brennan, T. A. (2000) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02219.x · Cited by 710
Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments
Murray, D. M., Varnell, S. P., & Blitstein, J. L. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.423 · Cited by 677
Watchdog or Lapdog? A Behavioral View of the Media as a Corporate Governance Mechanism
Bednar, M. K. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0862 · Cited by 503
Ghisletta, P., & Spini, D. (2004) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986029004421 · Cited by 388
Shattuck, D., Kerner, B., Gilles, K., Hartmann, M., Ng'ombe, T., & Guest, G. (2011) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2010.300091 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Lipsitz, S. R., Fitzmaurice, G. M., Orav, E. J., & Laird, N. M.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 270
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037803733
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance of Generalized Estimating Equations in Practical Situations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2533218
- The paper
- Lipsitz, S. R., Fitzmaurice, G. M., Orav, E. J., & Laird, N. M. (1994). Performance of Generalized Estimating Equations in Practical Situations. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.