The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES OF DECISION SPEED IN DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT.
Abstract
This study refined and extended some findings of previous research on decision-making speed. Decision speed was associated with simultaneous consideration of many alternatives, regardless of context. In contrast, the relationship between board experience and decision speed was context-specific. Similarly, decision speed was associated with higher performance only in high-velocity environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gama, F., & Magistretti, S. (2025) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12698 · Cited by 388
Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2017) · The SMS Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities · doi:10.1002/9781405164054.ch21 · Cited by 368
Technology-based, “adolescent” firm configurations
Bantel, K. A. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00033-5 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Judge, W. Q., & Miller, A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1991-06-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 449-463
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W3121283965
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
