The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RELATION OF DOMINANT PROBLEMS TO STAGES GROWTH IN TECHNOLOGY-BASED NEW VENTURES.
Abstract
Investigates the growth patterns of new ventures. A multimethod research design is employed to address criticisms of the literature on stages of growth. While the previous research found that problems influence internal organization, this study determines that problems also influence growth patterns. Two case studies are undertaken to examine the growth patterns of technology-based startups. Sixty managers and other employees were interviewed at two manufacturers of computer-based office products, located in Pennsylvania and Florida. This research generates a midrange theory of growth that applies only to certain organizations. The four stage model includes conception and development, commercialization, growth and stability. The validity of this stage-of-growth model is then assessed by studying the relation of dominant problems to stage. Four primary patterns of association are investigated, using responses to 105 questionnaires sent to a portfolio of firms in 1982. Types of problems include resource acquisition, technology development, vendor relations, production start-up, growth of sales and market share, profitability and internal controls. Results demonstrate that particular dominant problems are linked to each stage of growth. Problems and stages of growth do overlap, but there is also some support for a predictable pattern of problems faced by a firm as it grows. (SFL)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?
Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00029-3 · Cited by 3,047
A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders
Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F., & Neubaum, D. O. (2005) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.03.004 · Cited by 698
Dynamics of Social Capital and Their Performance Implications: Lessons from Biotechnology Start-ups
Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2006) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.51.2.262 · Cited by 678
Hanks, S. H., Watson, C. J., Jansen, E., & Chandler, G. N. (1994) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/104225879401800201 · Cited by 659
Short, J. C., Broberg, J. C., Cogliser, C. C., & Brigham, K. H. (2010) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109335949 · Cited by 644
Metadata
- Authors
- Kazanjian, R. K.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1988-06-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257-279
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W3122281393
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RELATION OF DOMINANT PROBLEMS TO STAGES GROWTH IN TECHNOLOGY-BASED NEW VENTURES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256548
- The paper
- Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). RELATION OF DOMINANT PROBLEMS TO STAGES GROWTH IN TECHNOLOGY-BASED NEW VENTURES. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256548
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.