Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ORGANIZATIONAL CONFIGURATIONS AND PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS.

KETCHEN, JR., D. J., COMBS, J. G., RUSSELL, C. J., SHOOK, C., DEAN, M. A., RUNGE, J., LOHRKE, F. T., NAUMANN, S. E., HAPTONSTAHL, D. E., BAKER, R., BECKSTEIN, B. A., HANDLER, C., HONIG, H., LAMOUREUX, S.·1997·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.2307/257028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The link between organizational configurations and performance has become a central and somewhat controversial focus of research in the strategic management literature, We statistically aggregated results from 40 original tests of the configurations-performance relationship. In contrast to previous qualitative reviews, this meta-analysis demonstrated that an organization's performance is partially explained by its configuration. Tests of four potential moderators showed that organizations' configurations contributed more to performance explanation to the extent that studies used (1) broad definitions of configurations, (2) single-industry samples, and (3) longitudinal designs, Results highlight the need for programmatic research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/257028

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
KETCHEN, Jr., COMBS, J. G., RUSSELL, C. J., SHOOK, C., DEAN, M. A., RUNGE, J., LOHRKE, F. T., NAUMANN, S. E., HAPTONSTAHL, D. E., BAKER, R., BECKSTEIN, B. A., HANDLER, C., HONIG, H., & LAMOUREUX, S.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
1997-02-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
223-240
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.2307/257028
OpenAlex
W2074641669
Cited by
327
References
2
FWCI
20.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.