The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities.
Abstract
Reviews qualifications to write these books.But he has an attractive if rather journalistic style, the data he presents are fully documented, and he includes useful appendices with additional technical information.In the first title the author has accumulated his evidence by detailed and extensive research, including encounters with addicts, pushers, and police.He examines all aspects of the drug and its use as an addictive agent, and provides fascinating trans- criptions of interviews and a chapter on "The British experience".In particular he points out the many myths and extensive mis-information concerning heroin and by so doing renders a useful service.Cocaine is more expensive and more fashionable.Several books on it have appeared recently and together with Ashley's they provide information which previously was very scanty.He presents a history of the drug and an account of its use by South American peoples, its popularity in the nineteenth century, the campaign against it, and of its recent reappearance as an addictive agent.Physical addiction to cocaine, according to Ashley, does not occur, so that again myths have grown up about it.In the last few years there has been a spate of books on drug addiction, occasioned by its extent in the world and by the anxiety of society wishing to understand more of the phenomenon in an attempt to suppress it.These books add to the corpus of knowledge, but not to successful treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 · Cited by 16,064
Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011928 · Cited by 4,461
The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312705052359 · Cited by 1,642
Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications
Valente, T. W. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301014.001.0001 · Cited by 933
Metadata
- Authors
- Mason, K. O., & Crane, D.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1973-09
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4300313809
- Cited by
- 1,151
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2576444
- The paper
- Mason, K. O., & Crane, D. (1973). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.2307/2576444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.