The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organizational Symbolism: A Topic to Expand Organizational Analysis
Abstract
Our basic purpose in this paper is twofold: (1) to call attention to “organizational symbolism,” an important aspect of all institutions that has been virtually ignored, and (2) to suggest questions for a comprehensive research program for studying this topic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Glick, W. H. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279045 · Cited by 1,286
Phenomenology: A New Way of Viewing Organizational Research
Sanders, P. (1982) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257327 · Cited by 513
Human resources management: some new directions
Ferris, G. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)00007-0 · Cited by 406
Corporate culture and organizational performance
Kim Jean Lee, S., & Yu, K. (2004) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940410537927 · Cited by 405
Johnson, G. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090107 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Dandridge, T. C., Mitroff, I., & Joyce, W. F.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1980-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110579313
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Symbolism: A Topic to Expand Organizational Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/257806
- The paper
- Dandridge, T. C., Mitroff, I., & Joyce, W. F. (1980). Organizational Symbolism: A Topic to Expand Organizational Analysis. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/257806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
